The server is too busy at the moment. Please try again later.

[straightgrain]

And I *am* looking at providing alternative options for the hosting, too.

[gtmtnbiker98]

This seems very unfair.. to the paying members especially. Are there any guidelines for reimbursement of the time lost?

Hey amstafHK, take a check? I'll reimburse you, but the stamp will cost more than the refund!!

[Shattered Mind]

I was on here this morning (Tuesday, the 23rd) from 7 am to almost 9 am with NO PROBLEMS... hope this is a good start.

[DrJWelch]

Things seem to have improved over the last 20 hours.....

[TFlanary]

=)!!

[HarperJT]

OK, I joined!!! When do we get the new server?

It does sceme to be working smoother.

Thanks,
Jeff

[straightgrain]

We've made some tweaks to how the site behaves. Working on evaluating a few different hosting options as we speak...

[Clay]

I've had 2 database errors today. A simple refresh cleared them up. I have also been running searches on the regular to ensure the server gets a workout. Well, really to avoid asking the same questions that have likely been asked before mine.

[straightgrain]

Truthfully, it's the site wide searches that are the most processor intensive activities. Not saying to not do it, but it does tend be the biggest pig in the pen.

[Brownie]

Truthfully, it's the site wide searches that are the most processor intensive activities. Not saying to not do it, but it does tend be the biggest pig in the pen.

Does the Google link(HERE) bog it down more, less, or about the same as the search box at the top of this page? I know that the results are better but don't know how it affects the server.