P2000 vs. USPc

[sterling99]

Newbie here. I recently had the pleasure of picking up a p2000 and have to say I was very impressed. I have several handguns but found the p2000 to be the best for ccw. I was not happy with the LEM trigger and I am currently selling my p2000 only to fund another HK firearm with a traditional SA/DA.

So my question to you guys is P2000 vs. USPc? Opinions are appreciated.

[Tecumseh]

I prefer the P2000 myself. I also prefer the USPc as well.

[LCSO264]

I too like both, but if your intent is to purchase a carry piece, I would lean toward the P2000, it just seems to suit concealed carry more? just my $.02 though, really you should go with which ever you are most comfortable shooting/carrying..

PS: you could always buy one of each?

[alayank]

+1 P2K

[sfguard]

Another vote for the P2K!

[gunut45]

Feel wise the P2000 is more comfortable.

I go with the USPc .45 because I like to C&L :D

[dobi2003]

if u hated the lem trigger so go for the USPc and get V1 C&L

[kraigster414]

I find the full size P2000 very comfortable for concealed carry. This is an exceptional weapon, is available in .40SW (now), and the interchangeable back straps are a major plus. Shown below in a Comp-Tac MTAC IWB:

[Greg Bell]

Unless you are really wanting C&L for some reason, the P2000 is the way to go. If you want .45, the USPc is the only way to go until HK brings in the HK45c, which is basically a .45 P2000.

[Vader]

I would go with the USPc.