+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 18 of 18

Thread: HK53 FTE with 762SND-6

  1. #11
    HKPRO PREMIUM PARTNER
    JTinIN's Avatar
    Join Date : Sep 2002
    Location : Indiana
    Age : 60
    Posts : 3,517

    Default

    Starting to look like extractor pulling off ... might also wish to "borrow" the extractor or bolt head on the postie 53 .., and try different ammo than Prvi

    While you are at it, try a different recoil sprint (i.e. gut the posties and try the entire bolt, carrier and spring in your ...).

  2. #12
    Member

    Join Date : Mar 2012
    Location : Texas
    Posts : 82

    Default

    I do wonder if the factory 53 will run with this can. But that is an excellent suggestion.

  3. #13
    jfk
    jfk is offline
    Desperately Needs Treatment
    jfk's Avatar
    Join Date : Jan 2001
    Posts : 1,421

    Default

    For clarification the OP has a C93 pistol (53 style clone). Does anyone here have a C93 pistol to compare to a factory 53 or at least a V53, in regards to the bolt carrier, cocking tube support, and length of recoil rod.

  4. #14
    Member

    Join Date : Mar 2012
    Location : Texas
    Posts : 82

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jfk View Post
    For clarification the OP has a C93 pistol (53 style clone). Does anyone here have a C93 pistol to compare to a factory 53 or at least a V53, in regards to the bolt carrier, cocking tube support, and length of recoil rod.
    Thanks JFK, but already have access to a HK53 for comparison. If you read my posts on this thread, I mention it several times.....

  5. #15
    Member

    Join Date : Mar 2012
    Location : Texas
    Posts : 82

    Default

    The factory HK53 I looked at today has a #15 locking piece. I'll swap the parts and report back with results. Thanks to all of you for the input.

  6. #16
    Member

    Join Date : Mar 2012
    Location : Texas
    Posts : 82

    Default

    The #15 locking piece did the trick. The gun now runs great with and without the can.

    I did some measurements on the HK53, a pre sample model, and the top of the bolt is about 2mm longer than the Century cut and welded bolt. The cocking piston, with the charging lever, was already tight, so the HK53 bolt would not lock in place. But I'm still happy with it.

  7. #17
    Member

    Join Date : Mar 2012
    Location : Texas
    Posts : 82

    Default

    Here is an image of the cut down bolt carrier, right, against the factory HK53 carrier, left. I mention above that the cocking extension, the tube that pushes on the carrier, has almost no play in it with the short carrier, so the factory carrier would not fit. Can the tube be shortened? The cut down bolt functioned fine in the HK53.



    Also, the change in locking piece did not alter the bolt gap. Still at .016".
    Last edited by Stout; 04-24-2012 at 11:52 PM.

  8. #18
    Member

    Join Date : Mar 2012
    Location : Texas
    Posts : 82

    Default

    I got a chance to try another SA trigger pack with a short ejector and all of the FTE problems disappeared. The gun ran flawless. Which ejector lever is the 53 supposed to have? And why are they different?

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Ads

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Search tags for this page

c93 pistol

,
c93 pistol to hk53
,
convert c93 pistol correct hk53 cocking tube
,
failure to eject hk53
,
fte hider
,
fte vector 53
,
hk53 55gr ammo
,
hk53 c93 photo
,
hk53 cocking tube jfk
,
replace 53 extractor spring
,
replacing hk53 extractor & spring
,
troubleshoot hk53