This really is great news. I've been following this a little bit myself, and following the news regarding Missouri's bill to restrict federal gun laws in the state.
The saddest part of this, is that Cali will most likly attempt to appeal, so we still have to see how it stands in the higher courts, to see whether the ruling will stick or not.
I am still waiting to hear to final ruling on the carry situation, since it is my understanding that it is in appeals, but based on that case things are looking good for a change.
The AG will do the same as Kamala Harris did and keep on appealing to drag this on. The Judge was pretty firm on his ruling but the 9th Circuit will overturn him and then we will have to wait for the Supreme Court to finally take a serious 2A case.
So, from what I understand, part of this is that the new “possession” law was overturned. If the 9th CC overrules and the “possession” law goes back into effect, that means all of these newly bought mags will be illegal again, right?
"To effectively preserve the status quo, and to prevent a sudden influx of large capacity magazines (LCMs) into the State of California (the “State”), Defendant respectfully requests that the Court issue an immediate, temporary stay pending its ruling on the application for a stay pending appeal. Even if this Court, or the Ninth Circuit, ultimately issues a stay pending appeal, the State will suffer irreparable injury if LCMs are permitted to flow into the State in the interim. Defendant respectfully requests that such a temporary stay be issued by no later than April 2,
2019."
"Defendant brings this ex parte application for good cause on the ground that the State will suffer irreparable and immediate injury until a stay pending appeal is issued. California has restricted the acquisition of LCMs for nearly two decades, and until the Judgment is stayed pending appeal, individuals will be free to acquire new LCMs, and there is evidence that sales have begun already. If Section 32310 is ultimately reinstated by the Ninth Circuit, it will be difficult for the State to remove these new LCMs."
Would it be as easy as to use the same argument that was used in court to win in all other states? I mean it should be right? 2nd amendment is universal across all states and territories.
I hope you guys in California are aware that Becerra is appealing the ruling to the progressive 9th circuit, and that if the 9th circuit strikes down the ruling, all of the mags you are buying now are illegal again. If it goes to the supreme court after that, it will depend on the opinion of Obamacare traitor Justice Roberts, who denied a stay on the bump stock ban.
BAD NEWS!!! It IS official! Becerra ordered a stay and you have got until 5.00 pm TODAY to make your purchase(s)!
After that, they can no longer be legally ordered or brought into the state, until the official hearing as to whether the law was struck down or not.
The opinion was mailed to the parties about 15 minutes ago. From the summary:
The panel affirmed the district court’s summary judgment in favor of plaintiffs challenging California Government Code § 31310, which bans possession of large capacity magazines (“LCMs”) that hold more than ten rounds of ammunition; and held that the ban violated the Second Amendment.
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
HKPRO Forums
1.9M posts
89.3K members
Since 2000
Actually created in 1999 (the original posts from the first database were lost), we are a forum dedicated to and laser-focused on Heckler & Koch firearms, Heckler & Koch accessories and the owners and enthusiasts that love them! Come join the discussion regarding HK pistols, long arms, NFA arms, HK accessories, HK history and trivia and more.