I'm trying to research the differences between HK A3 stocks, but I'm not seeing any threads that go into detail about the differences that someone should be aware of as a buyer.
I also noticed that the “A3” stock designator actually leads to a wide variety of stock possibilities. I was looking for a tail hook version as a work around to the NFA route, but apparently you have to permenantly modify an A3 to go that route; and I just am t comfortable enough for that route myself yet...
See next page of this thread for an example of a 3rd Gen stock with no MP5-10/40 bolt hold open cutout (thank you @MG34_Dan )
(not pictured) A3 (third generation) "F Style" MP5-10/MP5-40 long arm "Universal Stock" - See @MG34_Dan post on the next page
Note that the A3 (first generation) Convex was only intended for the 223/5.56 caliber rifles** as its "arms" are too long to fully collapse when mounted on an MP5
I would go with a factory A3 F from Numrich. I have never found one any cheaper. The F is superior in my opinion (unless you are going for a "look"). Also, why go with a knock-off "universal" F that has a fork cut out for a 40/10 BHO if you have no intentions of ever needing it. Just my opinion and I'm sure there are various others. https://www.gunpartscorp.com/products/1573180
I would go with a factory A3 F from Numrich. I have never found one any cheaper. The F is superior in my opinion (unless you are going for a "look"). Also, why go with a knock-off "universal" F that has a fork cut out for a 40/10 BHO if you have no intentions of ever needing it. Just my opinion and I'm sure there are various others.
I totally agree with this. The BHO cutout is annoying and considering how few 10mm/40S&W MP5s sold, there are a remarkable amount of stocks cut for them out there. (though the one pictured in my picture (displaying the four stocks) is an OEM HK MP5EA3 Universal Stock)
Yeah…..you say that until you get hooked on the MP5 10mm......and start building the sh$t out of them. Go with it...that way WHEN {not if} you get an MP5 10mm, you can move it from all 15 of your MP5's...… :biggrin:
That's a great price! I was getting ready to pull the trigger on one from brownells for 468 then ran across this post. Hard to believe it's HK for that price but seems like everyone here is in agreement that it is. Guess I'll have to order one
When I see an F stock with a .40 cut on it, I assume it's an ATI repro until I can find a date stamp. I had a bad ATI stock experience, so I am tainted now. The vast majority of F stocks with .40 cuts that you see are ATI stocks.
Sadly, no more date codes on HK furniture for several years now. None of the "F" stocks that I have ever seen have date codes (that's not saying that I have seen them all!).
I believe that is the general consensus. Fortunately, the ones I ordered from Numrich over the last few years did come in factory sealed bags with barcode.
There have been a variety of changes to the MP5 A3 stocks over the years. To the best of my knowledge, none of them had a convex shape to the butt plate. Even the prototype MP 64 had a concave shape.
One of the earlier A3 stocks had an all metal receiver end cap. Then, HK switched to a metal end cap where the rear portion of the end cap was plastic. HK also came out with a "universal" buttstock that had slightly longer forks and the bolt hold open cutout. This was intended to be used on both the .223 guns as well as the MP5 series. On an MP5, the longer forks would not let the stock fully retract. HK produced both the earlier A3 and subsequent "F" stocks with, and without a bolt hold open cutout. Then there is the multi position F stocks. Actually never had one of those, I have too many A3s as it is. There may be more versions, but that's all that come to mind.
On the universal stock, how would they work with the .223 if it has an H buffer? Buffered carrier or do you change out the H buffer?
Also, this seems like a good deal considering recent prices. Not mine and no affiliation. Description clarifies it is not air soft and seems to have purchased from HKParts.
The non-pistol caliber stock requires a different buffer. It is an internal spring with a button plunger. The H buffer is not sufficient enough and if the A3 stock does not have the fore mentioned, then the BCG needs to. If you fire your gun without one of these buffers, it may/will damage the receiver.
Ok. Thanks, is is possible to retrofit a universal stock with the correct stock buffer for the .223 or would you need to use the buffered carrier? I don’t think I have ever seen the buffer for the .223 for sale as a separate part, but maybe I have not searched correctly.
While we're on the subject of funky A3 stocks, how about this one? It appears to be an early HK A3 for and MP5 40/10 w/bho, but check out the length of the stock forks. They are very long and have three lock positions.
So far so good. Nothing really special. Now check this out.
I have both A3 and F type. The Ftype had a longer length of pull, thicker pad, and multiple positions. The A3 is lower profile. There's some other differences but a lot of is it aesthetics for people.
As far as know, neither. Never tried using the universal with a .223, and not sure I would want to experiment. I’ve never read anything from HK about changing out carriers (that would make little sense) or altering the stock when switching guns.
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
HKPRO Forums
1.9M posts
89.4K members
Since 2000
Actually created in 1999 (the original posts from the first database were lost), we are a forum dedicated to and laser-focused on Heckler & Koch firearms, Heckler & Koch accessories and the owners and enthusiasts that love them! Come join the discussion regarding HK pistols, long arms, NFA arms, HK accessories, HK history and trivia and more.