LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quoteit made me laugh when test b could not be preformed on competitive model. the techno music gets me too.
HK USP Tactical .45
HK Mark 23
HK USP Compact Tactical .45
HK P2000SK V2 LEM .40s&w
HK P30 .9mm
HK USP Fullsize .45 Stainless
Very interesting.
|
|
It appears to me that the ruptured receiver has happened before due to the tester all of the sudden eschewing the swimming goggles for a freaking medieval helmet. This test was performed by HK so I'll take the results with a grain of salt. That said, similar independent tests that produce the same outcome would sway me even more to HK's side.
What the hell? Hidden Content
LOL! I was thinking the same thing.Originally Posted by JumpmanUSC
This is a anoter intersting video from this particular poster.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KZs8Q4uHNuw
Last edited by AwaySooner; 05-14-2008 at 03:39 AM.
Whoa, good find Tspeis!
I have been trying to get this video out of HK for years! I can't understand why they wouldn't release it, as it clearly shows the difference in worst case rifle abuse.
The first principle is that you do not fool yourself. And you are the easiest one to fool. --Richard Feynman
awsome vid but i been surfing u tube 4 like 2 hrs now lol
I'm going to go ahead and say that the test shooter had some balls, or lack of brains to shoot that M4 knowing that it would likely blow up.
Sure he had a nice little helmet, but damn...metal shrapnel could have got him anywhere else.
LOL and what IS with the music...Goofy Germans love them some techno.
They can engineer weapons like the HK416 and G11 rifle, but can't build a rig to fire the rifle remotely?
The least that idiot could have done was wear some kevlar. Sure, the jousting helmet was cool, but I'm sure he's grown attached to his spleen, too.
HK45; P7M8 - AH.
Nothing in this post should be construed as legal advice, nor does this post constitute an attorney-client relationship.
Posting Permissions