HKPRO Forums banner
21 - 34 of 34 Posts
Once you cut/reprofile the barrel you can undo it sure, at the price of a new barrel. If you get a lighter/shorter rail you can at least change that back and forth.

As stated before it's your gun.
 
I'm not finding much online to back up the claim that reprofiling a barrel (correctly) is going to mess up the harmonics and cause it to shoot inaccurately. Isn't any barrel with variable thickness (such as the MR762 barrel) cut down from thicker material when it's produced in the first place?

I haven't found much online about people reprofiling their MR762s either, would be curious to hear about their results.

@nefariousarms, you seem like a person to ask. Any comments?
 
Isn't any barrel with variable thickness (such as the MR762 barrel) cut down from thicker material when it's produced in the first place?
It depends on the rifling method used. No matter which method is used though, they all start with the same steps. A length of bar stock is sawn off at a certain length, then it's chucked in a lathe and the ends squared up, followed by center drilling it. Next the bar stock is placed in a gun drilling machine, where they drill a hole several thou' smaller than the intended size through the entire length of bar stock. Then the drilled hole is reamed and honed to the final intended dimension, leaving a perfect mirror smooth finish inside, this process can be done either in a lathe or in most gun drilling machines as well. After all of these steps it's ready for the most important step of all, the actual rifling process. Depending on whether it will be button rifled, hammer forged, or cut rifled, it will be placed in a machine used for that sole purpose, and within no more than a couple of minutes (in the case of button rifling or hammer forging) or a couple of hours (in the case of cut rifling) the bar stock will have been rifled. All that is left to do before this rifled bar stock can be sold to the customer is a final stress-relieve, and in some cases contouring in a lathe. It will also have undergone stress-relieving once or twice earlier throughout the whole process, at least once after receiving it from the steel mill, when it's still raw bar stock, and depending on the barrel maker, once after drilling as well. So yes, unless it went through contouring as the final step, or it was rifled by hammer forging (which also profiles the barrel while it's being rifled) then you will have ended up with a cylindrical barrel blank, which still has to be turned down on a lathe to the final dimensions as used in a rifle. Sorry for the lengthy description, but I hope that it at least clears up part of your question.
 
I'm not finding much online to back up the claim that reprofiling a barrel (correctly) is going to mess up the harmonics and cause it to shoot inaccurately. Isn't any barrel with variable thickness (such as the MR762 barrel) cut down from thicker material when it's produced in the first place?

I haven't found much online about people reprofiling their MR762s either, would be curious to hear about their results.

@nefariousarms, you seem like a person to ask. Any comments?
the MR762 barrel is 2lbs 5oz I think we could get 4oz off of it without reducing accuracy

the MR556 is 2lbs 8oz in my opinion this is way too heavy, the M27 IAR barrel is 6oz lighter
 
Thanks for the info guys.

Very interesting that the MR762 barrel is that light given how heavy the rest of the gun is. Supposedly CSASS rifle is 8.7lbs, about a pound lighter than the MR762. I wonder if there were weight savings in other areas? (A stock MR762 with picattiny rail and no sights or magazine weighs about 9.6lbs, and the Geissele rail is actually heavier than the picattiny.)


*(Or was that a typo on the MR762 barrel weight at 2lbs 5oz? The MR556 barrel is actually heavier?)
 
Thanks for the info guys.

Very interesting that the MR762 barrel is that light given how heavy the rest of the gun is. Supposedly CSASS rifle is 8.7lbs, about a pound lighter than the MR762. I wonder if there were weight savings in other areas? (A stock MR762 with picattiny rail and no sights or magazine weighs about 9.6lbs, and the Geissele rail is actually heavier than the picattiny.)


*(Or was that a typo on the MR762 barrel weight at 2lbs 5oz? The MR556 barrel is actually heavier?)
The Geissele rail, while slightly heavier than the stock quad rail, provides quite a substantial amount of real estate for things like bipods, lasers, grips, clip on night vision, etc. I still stand by the statement that the G rail is the best upgrade for an MR 762
 
Weighs 354 g = 12.5 oz (only 23 g = 0.81 oz lighter than the quadrail handguard).
The slim-line buttstock weighs 261 g = 9.21 oz (126 g = 4.50 oz lighter than the fat buttstock).
I want to address the weight of the front of the rifle to bring the balance point back some.
The OP, quite understandably, wanted to lighten the front; switching to lighter buttstock will hardly help to achieve that aim ...
 
21 - 34 of 34 Posts