Joined
·
1,247 Posts
So I own both an HK45 full size and and HK45CT. And I gotta say that they are both very bad a** reliable pistols. I have only had the HK45CT for a few weeks now and have put about 300 rds thru it. Other than size the most glaring difference between these two is the grip. I guess I was overly surprised at just how much of an issue the grip difference is for me. I really prefer the grip texturing of the HK45 full size. I know all about the history of Vickers and Hackathorne, and that grip on the HK45 full size was not their idea, but that of HK. But I gotta say that I think HK got it right. I have a P2000 which is pretty much identical to the HK45C/CT grip. But this HK45CT grip seems even less aggressive than my P2000. I don't know maybe its because I'm so used to the grip on the HK45 since I carry it everyday.
So I am wondering what my fellow owners of these 2 HK models think. Don't misunderstand me. I love both these guns and will be doing nothing cosmetically to change them. But what a stark difference these grips are.
So I am wondering what my fellow owners of these 2 HK models think. Don't misunderstand me. I love both these guns and will be doing nothing cosmetically to change them. But what a stark difference these grips are.