just got back from the range. couldn't help myself. shot 250 rounds out of the kriss and 250 rounds out of the uk.
the kriss had better ergonomics. the stock fit better into my shoulder. the new design does do what it claims with less recoil
and minimal muzzle rise. i shot a tennis ball sized group with the vector. the hk's group was similar but looked like it was stretched a bit in
a 45 degree angle from bottom left to top right. i'm right handed.
the hk had a better trigger pull. it was consistent while the kriss had a little wiggle to it and has a shorter travel.
pulling the handle back and releasing the slide and pulling the trigger felt better in the hk. doing the same action in the vector felt awkward but it might do to not being familiar to a new style of gun.
if i could sum it up, the hk felt like a mercedes in form function and fit while the vector felt like a kit car. due to the vector's new design
of the action and it's shoulder stock i was able to shoot a tighter group with the vector and felt more comfortable shooting. the hk has an obvious build quality advantage over the vector in it's tolerances i.e. gaps between parts, finish etc...
the vector is extremely comfortable and fun to shoot. i'm more accurate with the vector due to it's comfort and minimal muzzle rise. if i could take one gun to the range to shoot, i would bring the vector. if my life depended on it then i would choose the hk.
just some initial impressions.
best,
cl