I'm considering getting an HK45c with night sights and light LEM, but I'm also interested in venturing into the 1911 arena, specially with one of the higher end production and semi-custom brands like Dan Wesson, Ed Brown, or Wilson.
At this time I've shot about 200 rounds through the HK45c (DA/SA) and Wilson CQB that my local range has available to rent. I do have previous experience with the LEM trigger.
The CQB is a bit easier to shoot because of its weight and size, but the HK... is well an HK. Having owned HKs I know I can beat the crap out of them, survive a zombie apocalypse, and know that the gun will still function with minimal maintenance/upkeep. With the 1911, it's going to need more regular care. At least this is my perception of the 1911 platform... it's a combat proven platform, but I don't want to spend more time cleaning and caring for the gun than shooting it.
For those with experience with both platforms, is my perception correct? Or are the high end 1911s just as reliable as an HK?
At this time I've shot about 200 rounds through the HK45c (DA/SA) and Wilson CQB that my local range has available to rent. I do have previous experience with the LEM trigger.
The CQB is a bit easier to shoot because of its weight and size, but the HK... is well an HK. Having owned HKs I know I can beat the crap out of them, survive a zombie apocalypse, and know that the gun will still function with minimal maintenance/upkeep. With the 1911, it's going to need more regular care. At least this is my perception of the 1911 platform... it's a combat proven platform, but I don't want to spend more time cleaning and caring for the gun than shooting it.
For those with experience with both platforms, is my perception correct? Or are the high end 1911s just as reliable as an HK?