Hello everyone,
I think this is my first post in hkpro forums. I have been reading a lot in this forum and i appreciate all the member's knowledgeable input on the various subjects; i have learned a lot from you guys. I have a question on the bolt carrier, the internal rails, and the recoils system of hk 416 vs g36/scar/ar 18/ or similar designs. I know that HK has done a fantastic job in designing the 416, and it has proven itself with extreme tests in different environments. However, i want to know what you guys think as far as advantages / disadvantages of ar 15 / hk 416 action compared to g36 / scar/ ar 18. I know that hk 416 does not have carrier tilt or unnecessary wear on the rails / buffer tube; at least i haven't heard about this issue anywhere. Therefore, mechanically speaking (not ergonomic advantages) which system do you guys prefer and why?
Thanks
Arbi
I think this is my first post in hkpro forums. I have been reading a lot in this forum and i appreciate all the member's knowledgeable input on the various subjects; i have learned a lot from you guys. I have a question on the bolt carrier, the internal rails, and the recoils system of hk 416 vs g36/scar/ar 18/ or similar designs. I know that HK has done a fantastic job in designing the 416, and it has proven itself with extreme tests in different environments. However, i want to know what you guys think as far as advantages / disadvantages of ar 15 / hk 416 action compared to g36 / scar/ ar 18. I know that hk 416 does not have carrier tilt or unnecessary wear on the rails / buffer tube; at least i haven't heard about this issue anywhere. Therefore, mechanically speaking (not ergonomic advantages) which system do you guys prefer and why?
Thanks
Arbi