Joined
·
497 Posts
Well, at least we don’t have to speculate anymore...
Surprising about the P30. Not Surprising about the other two. As you said, at least now we know.
It’s a capability enhancer for sure. I don’t blame someone for wanting to reap that benefit and being good with an Rds increases ability to call shots in the process and give one more wherewithal on their irons.Not a problem with me. I get the feeling a fair percentage of new shooters don't even bother trying to get good at shooting with iron sights anymore. Most seem to only be interested in pistols that are optics ready. I have yet to try one out myself and no hurry but might do it for my Browning Buckmark to try out.
I broke down and bought a $600 Trijicon, and mounted it on an FNX Tactical. It looks cool, and it's pretty fun to play with, but I'm not one of these guys that has to have every pistol be optic ready now. I mean, seriously... When you get to where you have dozens and dozens of Pistols, are you really going to have dozens and dozens of $600 optics for all of them? Oh you can swap an optic back and forth? Gotcha. Now you gotta unscrew it and mount it to a plate and then mount it to a different pistol, only to then have to sight it in from scratch. Sounds like loads of funPistols with RDS annoy me. I just don't see the appeal in making a concealable weapon bulkier and heavier for the sake of adding complexity, cost, and another failure point. A well designed set of irons accomplish the exact same thing with less to go wrong. Put the front dot in the center of the rear notch and squeeze the trigger. It's just not that hard. I feel like a nice red fiber optic dot up front does literally the exact same thing as the red dot in a RDS. Cover the intended POI with the dot and done. Now, in a competition pistol where the RDS might be frame-mounted rather than mounted on top of the reciprocating slide, I can see the speed advantage of not having to wait for the slide to stop moving before picking up the dot again, but that's not what we're talking about here. For a concealed carry or defensive pistol? KISS.
OP- is this your question to HK they responded to? If so, can you potentially ask about any future plans for updates to the current MR556 platform stateside? Cheers!
Nope, not my question to HK, just came across it on HK’s social media.OP- is this your question to HK they responded to? If so, can you potentially ask about any future plans for updates to the current MR556 platform stateside? Cheers!
When you get to where you have dozens and dozens of Pistols, are you really going to have dozens and dozens of $600 optics for all of them?
lol, nice flexUm... as a matter of fact... View attachment 290086
What if I told you that you could have irons with an RDS?Pistols with RDS annoy me. I just don't see the appeal in making a concealable weapon bulkier and heavier for the sake of adding complexity, cost, and another failure point. A well designed set of irons accomplish the exact same thing with less to go wrong. Put the front dot in the center of the rear notch and squeeze the trigger. It's just not that hard. I feel like a nice red fiber optic dot up front does literally the exact same thing as the red dot in a RDS. Cover the intended POI with the dot and done. Now, in a competition pistol where the RDS might be frame-mounted rather than mounted on top of the reciprocating slide, I can see the speed advantage of not having to wait for the slide to stop moving before picking up the dot again, but that's not what we're talking about here. For a concealed carry or defensive pistol? KISS.
Pfft. Well, sure you CAN... But is that really practical to have 4 dozen $600 optics? Almost 30K in optics? Right...Um... as a matter of fact... you can.