I have no doubt that HK45 is a fine weapon (it's an HK after all), but I'm not convinced that it is necessarily a better gun than the USP. It seems that HK45 is a step forward in some areas (more ergonomic grip, picatiny rail) while also a step backwards in others (lower magazine capacity, no dual spring recoil reduction system). So would anyone who owns both be interested in sharing their thoughts on which they you prefer and why?
Would like to see one field stripped so we can see the recoil spring system and slide/barrel and slide rail system on the frame - C'mon guys lets see the inside!
Where?? - the only one I've seen on this site is a USP Compact Tactical side by side with a HK45. Most folks want to see how the HK45 compares to the full size USP 45F in regards to length and height.
I don't have a pic to post; but from pics I have seen, the H&K45 is slimmer but also appears to be longer than the USP 45F.
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
HKPRO Forums
1.9M posts
89.4K members
Since 2000
Actually created in 1999 (the original posts from the first database were lost), we are a forum dedicated to and laser-focused on Heckler & Koch firearms, Heckler & Koch accessories and the owners and enthusiasts that love them! Come join the discussion regarding HK pistols, long arms, NFA arms, HK accessories, HK history and trivia and more.