Joined
·
1,862 Posts
I tried searching and couldn't really find anything on this. I wonder what was HK's logic or reasoning for making the P-series the way they did. The customization of the USP line is amazing and second to Glock, and the HK45 and .45c are just as versatile as the USP just doesn't have the aftermarket support like the USP but that's due to the HK45 being a very young pistol. I know we can opt to get the P-series in LEM or DA/SA... P30's with safeties or no safeties but I just wonder why HK took away the versatility from the P-Series. Also why they continue to warn against hot loads in the P-Series but my new 2010 USPc says +p and +p+ ammo is approved... I know the hot ammo thing is a non issue (Thanks to Todd G) and +p rounds don't do any more damage to the P-Series pistols than the USP pistols, but I constantly think... "Why did HK make the P-Series pistols this way?... Warning against hot ammo?... Will not approve trigger variant conversions?... Won't make threaded barrels for them?... Why HK?"
I heard the P2000 and P30 were supposedly meant to be service pistols and not military pistols but if that's true then does that mean HK did compromise? I mean why not make all you're pistols with the same versatility and bomb proof reliablity and bad ass customization that a tactical operator comes to appreciate?
(Just a side note, I'm not saying the P-Series are rubbish or are compromised lower quality pistols... I'm just wondering what was the reason for making the P-Series like they did)
I heard the P2000 and P30 were supposedly meant to be service pistols and not military pistols but if that's true then does that mean HK did compromise? I mean why not make all you're pistols with the same versatility and bomb proof reliablity and bad ass customization that a tactical operator comes to appreciate?
(Just a side note, I'm not saying the P-Series are rubbish or are compromised lower quality pistols... I'm just wondering what was the reason for making the P-Series like they did)