This is a piss poor review from someone who doesn't seem very knowledgeable. He says "above average" but rates it an "A-"? He states "Mechanically complex clockworks makes routine maintenance and servicing more difficult and less field-friendly, with air-soluble springs and small parts." So what is an air-soluble spring? What does internal complexity have to do with being field friendly? I'm not tearing it down to the springs in a field setting. His photo shows a line up of HK pistols and is captioned "HK 45s On Display" but clearly shows a P7M8 and a P30. While HK hurts everyone's wallet, to say "And, at $70 per magazine, it hurts the wallet" is way way off the mark these days.
He also says "Also, while accurate, the USP was not generally what many would call match grade." but then he says "ut when this HK45 proceeded to land a 1″ group at 15 yards off hand, soundly beating everything but my high-end custom 1911, I knew I had a plastic pistol I could really get into." I can get the same performance out of my USP.
Lastly, just a general non-HK question. In this review the author says "...Larry Vickers, a former Delta operator and one of the foremost 1911 pistolsmiths in the world..." With due respect to MSG Vickers contribution to the shooting community, do people really classify him in the same realm as John Nowlin, Virgil Tripp, Vic Tibbets and the pistolsmiths at Wilson Combat, Ed Brown, Les Baer, Cylinder & Slide (Bill Laughridge), Nighthawk Custom, Pistol Dynamics, and Cabot Guns?