HKPRO Forums banner
1 - 20 of 20 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
17 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
I have to say it's not an SP89 but I'm very impressed with the quality and functioning of my MKE pistol. I've already ran 350 rounds flawlessly without a hickup. The exterior and interior quality of mine is darn close I think to HK. The welds look nice and finish is great. I can't wait to get my stamp and throw a B&T folder and pistol grip HG on it.
 

Attachments

· Registered
Joined
·
56 Posts
I too think that MKE manufactures a great pistol.
One thing I felt a need to do was place a bevel on the bolt carrier where it contacts the hammer while cocking. The carrier was being marred from the 90 degree edge of the carrier. The bevel made a huge difference in cocking ease.
Might want to check yours.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,045 Posts
I have to say it's not an SP89 but I'm very impressed with the quality and functioning of my MKE pistol. I've already ran 350 rounds flawlessly without a hickup. The exterior and interior quality of mine is darn close I think to HK. The welds look nice and finish is great. I can't wait to get my stamp and throw a B&T folder and pistol grip HG on it.


Sexy B!tch!
 

· Registered
Joined
·
122 Posts
You made me want to break mine out to take a look at the bolt carrier. Mine doesn't have a bevel on the rear edge, but it is worn slightly round from firing. I've never noticed a problem cocking the carrier back manually and everything functions as it should on range days. I wonder if maybe you had a stronger hammer spring that made the friction too much between the hammer and carrier which is what gave you so many failures?
 

· Registered
Joined
·
56 Posts
You made me want to break mine out to take a look at the bolt carrier. Mine doesn't have a bevel on the rear edge, but it is worn slightly round from firing. I've never noticed a problem cocking the carrier back manually and everything functions as it should on range days. I wonder if maybe you had a stronger hammer spring that made the friction too much between the hammer and carrier which is what gave you so many failures?
I never had any failures.
I didn't think the marks on the hammer from the carrier were appropriate. If you look at the firing pin retaining plate on a 1911, you will see that it is rounded/beveled to ease the cocking of the hammer.
I could imagine that a squared off carrier might slow the inertia of the carrier assembly to cause FTE issues. Check out images of other bolt carriers and you will see many have a bevel.

See post #17 Bevel
 

· Registered
Joined
·
25 Posts
I too think that MKE manufactures a great pistol.
One thing I felt a need to do was place a bevel on the bolt carrier where it contacts the hammer while cocking. The carrier was being marred from the 90 degree edge of the carrier. The bevel made a huge difference in cocking ease.
Might want to check yours.
Good grief! That makes all the sense in the world. I have a Z5-P I bought recently and while I love the gun, it is damn hard to charge. My wife can't even charge it. I just check and my bolt carrier has a 90 degree edge, looks like I need to fix that right away.

How would you recommend beveling the edge? Stones and/or fine files? Of course I would start slow and only take a little off at a time.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
1,569 Posts
Good grief! That makes all the sense in the world. I have a Z5-P I bought recently and while I love the gun, it is damn hard to charge. My wife can't even charge it. I just check and my bolt carrier has a 90 degree edge, looks like I need to fix that right away.

How would you recommend beveling the edge? Stones and/or fine files? Of course I would start slow and only take a little off at a time.
I did my friends with a diamond hone to break the edge and finished with buffing wheel on my bench grinder. It polished to a mirror finish and made a huge improvement.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
56 Posts
The carrier is hard material. I used a die grinder to establish the initial profile then a honing stone to polish. I use Brownell's action lube on the carrier and hammer contact face.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
71 Posts
I too think that MKE manufactures a great pistol.
One thing I felt a need to do was place a bevel on the bolt carrier where it contacts the hammer while cocking. The carrier was being marred from the 90 degree edge of the carrier. The bevel made a huge difference in cocking ease.
Might want to check yours.
Please provide a pick of where you did the bevel. Curious to see it. Thanks
 

· Registered
Joined
·
16 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
319 Posts
I did my friends with a diamond hone to break the edge and finished with buffing wheel on my bench grinder. It polished to a mirror finish and made a huge improvement.
ived used this method on my AK's and my MKE 5-RS with great success . i finish with mag wheel cleaner/polish, slick em with castrol syn. tranny and marvel oil 50/50 . GTG !
 

· Registered
Joined
·
30 Posts
I got my z5rs about a week ago and the overall quality is very good. I pulled it apart to clean it because they did not clean it after test firing it, I noticed the back of the carrier is very slightly rounded and there is a contact mark on the hammer but could not feel it with a fingernail- also it is easy to pull back the charging handle all seems ok. Tool Metal Machine tool
Electronics Technology Electronic device Automotive exterior Rear-view mirror
 
1 - 20 of 20 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top