HKPRO Forums banner
21 - 40 of 108 Posts
Sorry to revive this thread, but has anyone tried that Shield SMS with their mount that was listed above?

https://www.shieldpsd.com/shop-2/shield-mini-sight-sms-1moa-dot
https://www.shieldpsd.com/shop-2/sms-mount-for-hk-mp5

Its a pretty sweet looking idea. I'm leaning towards reflex site over microdot for my mp5 as I don't see myself needing the additional ruggedness of a microdot and yet I like the smaller frame of most reflex sites to let me see more. Not sure how I feel about lower 1/3 cowitness versus higher and more out of the way. Seems like the lower 1/3 might be a bit cluttered. Not a big fan of the idea of cowitness with how much it obstructs the view.
 
I just picked up the MFI low pro mount for my SP5 SBR. I have to say that this is by far one of the best aftermarket mounts I’ve seen and used. In the military we were issued the HK claw mount and it worked great to be able to still retain the use of the irons. I was definitely not going to spend the asking for that mount or the HK Factory Mount. I went on a search and found that most of you were using this exact MFI Mount and were very happy with it. If you don’t know which one I’m referring to click on this link https://mfiap.com/i-23899698-mfi-sp...le-and-the-end-of-the-rail-price-includes-usps-priority-shipping-insurance.html it will take you straight to it. I will need to mount my Aimpoint Micro to it and go zero it this weekend. Thank you for helping me decide on another alternative to the HK factory mounts.
 

Attachments

New Guy Here,

I use the Burris Fast Fire 3 on my PTR clone. I get what you would call 1/3rd co-witness. Im not a fan. I have the integrated Picatinney rail on the upper so Im looking for something with a lower profile. In the mean time I grabbed an A3 Tactical Riser so I can use both Red Dot and Iron sights. Im hoping I dont have to adjust my check to stock position.
 
New Guy Here,

I use the Burris Fast Fire 3 on my PTR clone. I get what you would call 1/3rd co-witness. Im not a fan. I have the integrated Picatinney rail on the upper so Im looking for something with a lower profile. In the mean time I grabbed an A3 Tactical Riser so I can use both Red Dot and Iron sights. Im hoping I dont have to adjust my check to stock position.
Welcome to the site. Although this is an HK site, we welcome all. If you cruse the forum lists you will see there is a sub forum specifically for clone weapons. Your question may be better off asked in there due to fact your optic rail is welded vs removable. Your options are limited due to that fact vs the HK where you can get various hgt rails to aid in adjusting your optic hgt.

Edit: Not meant as a discouragement, there many knowledge wealthy folks in here that are more then willing to help. My original statement was just a mere suggestion. :wink:
 
Sorry to revive this thread, but has anyone tried that Shield SMS with their mount that was listed above?

https://www.shieldpsd.com/shop-2/shield-mini-sight-sms-1moa-dot
https://www.shieldpsd.com/shop-2/sms-mount-for-hk-mp5

Its a pretty sweet looking idea. I'm leaning towards reflex site over microdot for my mp5 as I don't see myself needing the additional ruggedness of a microdot and yet I like the smaller frame of most reflex sites to let me see more. Not sure how I feel about lower 1/3 cowitness versus higher and more out of the way. Seems like the lower 1/3 might be a bit cluttered. Not a big fan of the idea of cowitness with how much it obstructs the view.
Yes - and it's awesome.
 
Just recently received my German version SP5. I've used MP5s at work and already owned an old HK94 with the vintage but reliable Beeman's SS scope.

I had an old Aimpoint Comp M2 that I thought I'd throw on the SP5. I bought an MFI low mount made for the SP5, even has cutouts to see the serial numbers. Fine quality and mounted solidly. I only had a GG&G cantilevered mount for the M2 and when mounted it totally blocked the irons.
 

Attachments

Just recently received my German version SP5. I've used MP5s at work and already owned an old HK94 with the vintage but reliable Beeman's SS scope.

I had an old Aimpoint Comp M2 that I thought I'd throw on the SP5. I bought an MFI low mount made for the SP5, even has cutouts to see the serial numbers. Fine quality and mounted solidly. I only had a GG&G cantilevered mount for the M2 and when mounted it totally blocked the irons.
I found an old Aimpoint ultra low mount base designed for the MP5. It was nicely made and sat lower than the MFI base (which is available with instructions and allen wrench, PM me). I used a Vertex 30mm ring on the Aimpoint and it worked out great. The vertex ring looks just like the one Aimpoint used to sell but discontinued. I can see the irons through the Aimpoint although not true co-witnessing. At least if the red dot fails, I can still draw a bead on my target. I'm really pleased with this solid set up.
 

Attachments

Sorry to revive this thread, but has anyone tried that Shield SMS with their mount that was listed above?

SHIELD Mini Sight (SMS) 1MOA Dot
SMS Mount for H&K MP5

Its a pretty sweet looking idea. I'm leaning towards reflex site over microdot for my mp5 as I don't see myself needing the additional ruggedness of a microdot and yet I like the smaller frame of most reflex sites to let me see more. Not sure how I feel about lower 1/3 cowitness versus higher and more out of the way. Seems like the lower 1/3 might be a bit cluttered. Not a big fan of the idea of cowitness with how much it obstructs the view.
I know this is an old question but it might help someone. The Shield SIS and mount have been rock solid for well over 5k rounds now.

Here is a pic of the Shield SIS and mount on my omega clone.


Here is a pic of the absolute co-witness view with the 1moa dot.
 
I know this is an old question but it might help someone. The Shield SIS and mount have been rock solid for well over 5k rounds now.

Here is a pic of the Shield SIS and mount on my omega clone.


Here is a pic of the absolute co-witness view with the 1moa dot.
Such a clean setup, and thanks for the 5k feedback. I'm looking into this mount with a SRO. The bigger window is appealing to me. I'm trying to keep the setup as light as possible.
 
Has anyone have any experience with running the Scalaworks Leap mounts on the sp5k with the RMR? I want to understand if you prefer the 1.4 or 1.5 height and why. I am interesting in getting this for my PDW.
 
Here's what I've been playing around with:

My favorite for the time being is the Eotech 512 on B&T 21222 mount. This combo puts the optic's view above the triple tree for a cleaner sight picture, but because of that you're resting in between cheek and chin weld instead of a full cheek weld:
Image

Image


Next is the same BT-21222 mount with an Aimpoint PRO mounted in their 10830 high ring (discontinued). I've searched everywhere for their 10818 low ring but couldn't find one as that's been discontinued too. Although the Aimpoint ring has a thumbscrew for mounting, it really needs to be tightened down with a screw driver to keep the optic from shifting.
As you can see the triple tree is somewhat obtrusive (between cheek-chin weld height), but it's not too bad:
Image

Image


Then I tried the BT-10266 Aimpoint mount with the PRO. I think this is the lowest mount B&T has for this platform:
Image

Image


Co-witness? Not a chance! The 10818 low ring might give me a lower 1/3, but then again I prefer a cleaner sight picture. I might try a low Weaver 30mm scope ring at some point if I find one for cheap for curiosity's sake.
Image



And then........just for kicks here's an Elcan SU230/PVS. The eye relief is so bad on these things you'll probably get better results with a straw 🤣
Image



Ultimately I'd like to try some more "classical" setups, like a Trijicon RX01/RX06 or maybe even a C-More Railway. I think I've played too many video games where they had this type of setup and it's given me an itch to scratch as those were my go-to's lol.

I might even try going for a Trijicon SRO. I've seen some where it's mounted in place of the rear sight drum, but I'd like to see it up front on the rail.
 
Has anyone have any experience with running the Scalaworks Leap mounts on the sp5k with the RMR? I want to understand if you prefer the 1.4 or 1.5 height and why. I am interesting in getting this for my PDW.
I went with the 1.42" LEAP on my MP5K-N so I could clear the front sight hood and still use the irons. I plan on running the same setup but with a SRO on my MP5K-SD once it's completed.
 

Attachments

Discussion starter · #34 ·
I wish I would have kept my RMR on a LEAP, would have been the best of both worlds. I am 100% over trying to get a co-witness with irons across all rifle/carbine platforms. I must not be the only one seeing how popular the 1.93 mounts are for the AR these days. Currently use a T-2 on a 1.93 LEAP and love the heads up shooting position.

I just installed an MRO on the MP5 with a 1.93 Reptilia. You cannot see the front sight at all in the sight picture but I have not shot this setup yet. If I can find a cheap Aimpoint Micro LEAP mount (1/3 height probably) then that would cover both irons usage and red dot usage on the MP5. This MRO setup is going to live somewhere else.

But yeah, its a damn sky scraper mount!
 
Discussion starter · #35 · (Edited)
The Scalarworks mount doesn't fit on my B&T 21241 low mount, even backwards per that one thread. Stinks. I am tempted to go bubba on the B&T and dremel out a notch for that wheel/clamp to fit.

Edit: It is done. I had to bubba the B&T with a Dremel...

 
For those who tried co-witness and non co-witness setups, which do you prefer and why?

I have not ordered a rail or sight for my new SP5 so I'm starting with a clean slate.
I had several things I wanted when I decided to add an optic. I wanted to be able to use my iron sights with some kind of co-witness, and I wanted quick detach capability for my optic on top of the H&K brand picatinny mount. I just like the overall versatility of the set-up. I ended up getting a Trijicon MRO Pro mounted on a KZ Ultra-Low QR mount on top of my HK picatinny mount. The KZ mount is the weakest part of the set-up, but the MRO seems to hold zero no matter how many times I remove it and put it back on (which I do a lot), so I've been happy with everything. Not being able to co-witness the sights was never an option.
 
I had several things I wanted when I decided to add an optic. I wanted to be able to use my iron sights with some kind of co-witness, and I wanted quick detach capability for my optic on top of the H&K brand picatinny mount. I just like the overall versatility of the set-up. I ended up getting a Trijicon MRO Pro mounted on a KZ Ultra-Low QR mount on top of my HK picatinny mount. The KZ mount is the weakest part of the set-up, but the MRO seems to hold zero no matter how many times I remove it and put it back on (which I do a lot), so I've been happy with everything. Not being able to co-witness the sights was never an option.
Have you tried both co-witness and non co-witness? I’m trying to get a sense of the pros and cons from people who have tried both.

My guess is that co-witness allows a more secure cheek weld while non co-witness allows for more rapid target acquisition and shooting with both eyes open.
 
Have you tried both co-witness and non co-witness? I’m trying to get a sense of the pros and cons from people who have tried both.

My guess is that co-witness allows a more secure cheek weld while non co-witness allows for more rapid target acquisition and shooting with both eyes open.
When I was dinking around with mounting options, I found that I didn't care for anything that positioned my head higher, and it makes more sense to me to have as consistent a cheek weld as possible if having to switch between aiming options. Plus, I didn't care for anything that increased the weapon's profile. I always shoot with both eyes open, so that didn't make a difference for me. If I were to get a second SP5, I would probably try the Battle Steel mount I have along with a Scalarworks Leap mount which would be set up to be non co-witness. I'm not sure target acquisition speed is all that much faster, or that practice/training wouldn't make that a non-issue. I guess super fast acquisition speed is not a high priority for me.
 
Have you tried both co-witness and non co-witness? I’m trying to get a sense of the pros and cons from people who have tried both.

My guess is that co-witness allows a more secure cheek weld while non co-witness allows for more rapid target acquisition and shooting with both eyes open.
What about just getting the optic to a height that allows you to get as fast a sight picture as possible in your particular natural shooting position without having to move your head too much?
 
21 - 40 of 108 Posts