I have a P2000 LEM that started life as a V2 and was just switched to V1.
I ran about 200 rounds through this thing today, more or less as a function check before carrying it again after I changed the mag release, FPBS and TRS. And I have to say, I really liked it as a V2. As a V1, I think it's the ****. My groups shrunk by about 25%. I can only guess it's the lighter trigger.
For ****s and giggles I Googled HK P2000 LEM review. I must have read a dozen reviews. All complaining about the LEM. All complaining about the cost of HKs in general. I have about $750 in my P2000. After adding night sights and other items to both my Gen 4 Glocks, I have almost that much in each of them. I have four Sigs. All of them were way more than my P2000. I don't know of any gun I own that was cheaper than my HK if you consider things I have done or had done to them to make them better for me. I just don't get it. Seemingly it's alright to spend $500+ on a gun and then spend $200 on sights and aftermarket triggers. Or spend $1000 on an alloy frame gun that seems to be hit or miss here lately.
I don't know. I just wanted to vent. I am going to assume that HK doesn't advertise much. Because it seems the magazines that give all these rave reviews always seem to have a two page color add somewhere in it matching whatever was just reviewed.
rant over.
I ran about 200 rounds through this thing today, more or less as a function check before carrying it again after I changed the mag release, FPBS and TRS. And I have to say, I really liked it as a V2. As a V1, I think it's the ****. My groups shrunk by about 25%. I can only guess it's the lighter trigger.
For ****s and giggles I Googled HK P2000 LEM review. I must have read a dozen reviews. All complaining about the LEM. All complaining about the cost of HKs in general. I have about $750 in my P2000. After adding night sights and other items to both my Gen 4 Glocks, I have almost that much in each of them. I have four Sigs. All of them were way more than my P2000. I don't know of any gun I own that was cheaper than my HK if you consider things I have done or had done to them to make them better for me. I just don't get it. Seemingly it's alright to spend $500+ on a gun and then spend $200 on sights and aftermarket triggers. Or spend $1000 on an alloy frame gun that seems to be hit or miss here lately.
I don't know. I just wanted to vent. I am going to assume that HK doesn't advertise much. Because it seems the magazines that give all these rave reviews always seem to have a two page color add somewhere in it matching whatever was just reviewed.
rant over.