HKPRO Forums banner

A Precision Shooter's Technical Tour: Comparing the MR762 and M110A1 Designated Marksman Rifles

36K views 104 replies 26 participants last post by  john_doe  
#1 · (Edited)
This is an analysis of the Old and New MR762/MR308, the G28 and the M110A1 CSASS/SDMR. It analyzes technical specifications, accuracy, precision and ballistics from the perspective of a precision marksman or military/police sniper. This will be a dynamic post, and I will update it as new information becomes available to me.

Image

Old and New MR762s: a 2012 MFD DMR and 2022 MFD LRPIII,
both equipped with EOTech VuDu 3.5-18x H59 Optics

Last updates made on 27 APR 2025
Many sections have been completely rewritten. Updated details on the manufacturing of H&K barrels in section 6.3, and corrected both grammar and spelling mistakes. Updated Part 2 Section 2 on the PSG-1 to add more relevant information about it. And a complete rewrite of Part 1 Section 3 to better explain the physics of barrel harmonics and ballistics.

Raw information -- shot groups, photos, videos and range days -- can be found on
Instagram Here

* * *
Table of Contents:

Table of Contents:
PART 1: ACCURACY VS PRECISION IN THE MR WEAPON SYSTEM FAMILY

  • 1. ACCURACY AND PRECISION
  • 2. BARREL SPECIFICATIONS, CONTOURS & TWIST RATES
  • 3. THE BALANCE BETWEEN VELOCITY AND HARMONICS
    • 3.1 - Seismic Impulse and the Onset of Harmonics
    • 3.2 - Barrel Length vs. Muzzle Velocity (and Why It Matters)
    • 3.3 - Understanding Barrel Harmonics (Why Vibration Affects Accuracy)
    • 3.4 - Twist Rate and Bullet Stability (Gyroscopic vs. Harmonics)
    • 3.5 - Putting It All Together: Consistency is King
    • 3.6 - Conclusion
  • 4. ANALYSIS OF THE NEW MEDIUM CONTOUR MR762
  • 5. HK's FRENCH CANNON GRADE STEEL - AUBERT & DUVAL
    • 5.1 - Compared to CMV Steel
    • 5.2 - Compared to 416R Steel
    • 5.3 - Shaping a Heckler & Koch Barrel
PART 2: REAL WORLD BALLISTICS OF THE MR WEAPON SYSTEM FAMILY
  • 1. The HK Weapon System for Precision - Barrel Break-in & Maintenance
  • 2. Understanding the Standard - The PSG-1
  • 3. The HK417 & G28 DMRs - A Response to the Global War on Terror
  • 4. The G28 DMR – Evolution of a Precision Rifle
  • 5. First Generation MR762 - Teething Issues
  • 6. Late Generation MR762 - New Machining and Modern Reform
  • 7. Medium Contour MR762 - The Weight Loss
  • 8. The M110A1 - The Culmination for the Everyday Marksman
    • 8.1 Introduction to the M110A1 CSASS & SDMR
    • 8.2 Mechanical Differences
    • 8.3 Assessment of Precision & Capabilities
  • 9. The MR762 A4 - The New Kid on the Block
CONCLUSIONS
  • Invitation
* * * PART 1 * * *

ACCURACY VS PRECISION IN THE MR WEAPON SYSTEM FAMILY

1. ACCURACY AND PRECISION

First, we need to define two terms: Accuracy, and Precision.

"Precision and accuracy are two ways that scientists think about error. Accuracy refers to how close a measurement is to the true or accepted value. Precision refers to how close measurements of the same item are to each other. Precision is independent of accuracy. That means it is possible to be very precise but not very accurate, and it is also possible to be accurate without being precise." (REF 1)

From this, we can define the following as a shooter and weapon system:
  • Accuracy: the degree of closeness to true value. When a shooter pulls the trigger, it is up to the shooter to fire accurately
  • Precision: the degree to which an instrument or process will repeat the same value. A rifle needs to be built and tuned to offer the greatest precision possible for its designated purpose.
In other words, accuracy is the degree of veracity while precision is the degree of reproducibility. It is up to the rifle to be precise. It is up to the shooter to be accurate. With these two terms defined, we can proceed focusing on the precision of the MR762.

* * *​

2. BARREL SPECIFICATIONS, CONTOURS & TWIST RATES

The HK MR762 rifle series is built around a 16.5-inch, 1:11 twist, non-chrome-lined barrel. This twist rate is consistent across all MR762 variants, including the post-2021 contoured barrel versions – despite an error still present on HK USA's website incorrectly listing the newer medium contour barrel as 1:12. This has been confirmed by both HK engineers and documented user inquiry within the HKPro community (Forum reference: https://www.hkpro.com/threads/mr762-light-barrel-twist-rate.574224/).

While twist rate requirements vary with projectile length and velocity, a 1:11 twist is a balanced choice for stabilizing most common 7.62 NATO/.308 loads between 147 and 185 grains. It provides sufficient gyroscopic stability for both mid-weight and heavier match-grade projectiles at standard velocities. HK’s decision to maintain this twist rate across all MR variants simplifies logistics while retaining compatibility with a wide range of ammunition.

Unlike military-issued counterparts such as the G28 and M110A1 – which feature chrome-lined bores for extended service life and corrosion resistance – the MR762’s barrel prioritizes precision over adverse environment protection by omitting chrome lining. The MR barrels are heat-pressed into the monolithic upper receiver, contributing to system rigidity and repeatable shot behavior. All HK barrels are machined from French cannon-grade steel sourced from Aubert & Duval, providing a high-strength foundation for consistent performance, discussed in Part 1 Section 6.

While the broader trend in 7.62 precision rifles has shifted toward faster twist rates (1:10 to 1:8) to better stabilize long-for-caliber bullets at extended ranges, the 1:11 twist in the MR762 has proven to be a versatile and capable performer for most DMR and general precision use cases. As such, Part 3 will explore how this twist rate, in combination with barrel length and harmonics, affects real-world precision and consistency in the field.

* * *

Image

Testing of the M110A1 CSASS during trials

3. THE BALANCE BETWEEN VELOCITY AND HARMONICS

Barrel harmonics are neither theoretical nor mystical; they are a measurable product of physics, observable with tools such as high-speed videography, strain gauges, and acoustic sensors. When a bullet is fired, the ignition of the powder creates a rapidly expanding pressure wave that propels the bullet down the bore while also exciting the barrel into oscillation. This oscillation follows repeatable wave patterns – much like a tuning fork – and certain points along the barrel move minimally during the cycle (“nodes”). If bullet exit coincides with a node, muzzle position is more consistent shot-to-shot, directly reducing group size.

For a rifle to be accurate, these harmonics must be both consistent and predictable. The MR762 and M110A1 achieve this through fixed engineering choices: cold hammer forging for metallurgical uniformity, tapered heavy contours to control amplitude, and ammunition pairing to match the barrel’s inherent vibration profile. The result is precision repeatability without additional moving parts or field-maintenance complexity.

Key points to understand:
  • Barrel Movement: Firing a round creates both forward acceleration of the bullet and a complex oscillation in the barrel – involving whip, torque, and contortion – that forms a wave-like motion.
  • Repeatability: Consistent accuracy requires harmonics to behave predictably from shot to shot; unpredictable movement shifts the point of impact.
  • Factors Influencing Harmonics: Barrel length, thickness, contour, steel composition, and ammunition choice all influence harmonic behavior.
  • Node Timing: Aligning bullet exit with a vibration node minimizes muzzle movement at the moment the projectile leaves the barrel.
  • Engineering vs. Add-Ons: Unlike adjustable barrel tuners that change vibration timing artificially, the MR762 and M110A1 are tuned through design and load selection from the start.
Understanding and managing harmonics is essential to balancing accuracy with velocity. In rifles like the HK MR762, extending barrel length may yield higher muzzle velocity, but each added inch also alters harmonic behavior. Precision shooting demands finding that balance point where velocity gains do not come at the expense of stable, repeatable vibrations.

This section breaks down those concepts.

3.1 - Seismic Impulse and the Onset of Harmonics

Before diving into twist rates, barrel timing, and harmonics, it’s important to first understand what initiates the entire chain of barrel vibration: the ignition of the round itself. When a cartridge is fired, the detonation of the primer and the rapid expansion of gas from the powder create an instantaneous, high-energy shock wave that travels through the entire rifle system. This shockwave is fast – extremely fast – reaching speeds around 13,200 MPH (19,000 FPS), far exceeding the bullet’s own velocity.

This high-pressure pulse slams into the chamber walls, bullet base, and the inner surface of the barrel, launching intense longitudinal and torsional shock waves. These waves do not simply move forward toward the muzzle and dissipate; they reflect, rebound, and reverberate back toward the chamber, setting up complex standing wave patterns throughout the barrel. Just like ripples in water can collide, reinforce, or cancel each other, the barrel experiences flexion, whip, torsion, and pitch – vibrations that interact dynamically for the brief moment the bullet is still inside. Understanding this continuous, bidirectional wave behavior is critical: these internal vibrations establish the barrel’s natural resonant modes, which in turn govern the muzzle’s behavior at the exact moment the bullet exits.

As the bullet travels down the bore, its mass and movement add further dynamic force, modifying and reinforcing these existing vibrations. The combination of ignition shock and projectile movement generates the barrel’s harmonic signature. This is why even a short, heavy-profile barrel can experience substantial vibration after firing – not simply because of the bullet’s motion, but because of the energetic waves set off at ignition.

These internal oscillating waves can generally be classified by their mode of movement: compressional waves (P-waves) and shear waves (S-waves).

3.2 - Barrel Length vs. Muzzle Velocity (and Why It Matters)

Since oscillation is now a defined function, barrel length is one of the most obvious factors influencing a rifle’s performance. Generally, a longer barrel allows the propellant gas more time to accelerate the bullet, resulting in higher muzzle velocity. Higher velocity is beneficial for long-range shooting because it means a flatter trajectory (less bullet drop) and often less wind drift. For example, a .308 Winchester firing a 175 gr bullet from a 20″ barrel might achieve a muzzle velocity a hundred feet per second higher than from a 16″ barrel. And a 24" barrel achieving a hundred feet more than a 20". This extra speed can keep the bullet supersonic farther out and reduce drop at a given distance.

However, a longer barrel does not equate to a more accurate barrel, by default. In fact, beyond a certain point, a longer barrel (depending on its design) can flex and vibrate more, which may slightly reduce mechanical accuracy at short range. A barrel acts somewhat like a cantilevered beam – when the gun is fired, the rapid pressure increase and bullet movement cause the barrel to resonate and vibrate in a “rope-like” fashion. These vibrations are the barrel’s harmonics, and they can affect where the muzzle is pointing at the exact moment the bullet exits. The magnitude of these harmonic vibrations grows rapidly with barrel length (roughly proportional to the square of the length). In other words, a longer barrel will tend to have more pronounced whip or oscillation than a shorter one, all else being equal.

By contrast, a shorter barrel is stiffer and tends to oscillate less. Think of trying to bend a short thick rod versus a long thin rod – the short rod is much harder to flex. The same goes for barrels: a short, heavy-profile barrel will vibrate less (and at a higher natural frequency) than a long, thin barrel. This is why many precision rifles use heavy “bull” barrels or shorter barrels: increasing the diameter or reducing the length greatly increases stiffness (at the cost of added weight). The HK MR762’s 16.5″ barrel is a design compromise: it is long enough to get good velocity from 7.62 NATO/.308 rounds, but short enough (and of a stout profile) to minimize excessive whip. This is also why the heavy barreled variants have existed, like the LRP package. The result is a rifle that’s easier to handle and potentially very precise, even if it gives up a bit of velocity compared to a 20″-24″ sniper barrel.

To put it simply, velocity alone doesn’t guarantee accuracy. A longer barrel will shoot the bullet faster, but if that barrel is whipping around more, your shots can spread out. On the other hand, a shorter or stiffer barrel might shoot groups tighter (due to less vibration), but the bullets will travel slower and drop more at long range, let alone being affected by environmentals. The key is finding the right balance for the intended use. The MR762, meant as a DMR (Designated Marksman Rifle), balances these by using a moderately short, rigid barrel – sacrificing a bit of muzzle velocity in exchange for handiness and consistency.

3.3 - Understanding Barrel Harmonics (Why Vibration Affects Accuracy)

Now we can expand on what is truly happening within the barrel from these waveforms. When a shot is fired, the ignition of propellant gases and the bullet's rapid movement down the bore generate complex vibrational phenomena within the rifle barrel. These vibrations are primarily driven by two types of elastic waves: P-waves (primary, pressure waves) and S-waves (secondary, shear waves).
  • P-waves (or primary waves) are pressure waves. They move by pushing and pulling the material in the same direction the wave is traveling, like a slinky being compressed and stretched. P-waves can travel through solids, liquids, and gases. In a rifle, they are created by the explosion of the gunpowder and the rapid expansion of gases, sending a powerful pressure shock through the barrel steel almost instantly.
  • S-waves (or secondary waves) are shear waves. Instead of pushing and pulling, they move the material laterally or vertically, side-to-side, at a right angle to the wave's direction -- like shaking a rope up and down. S-waves only travel through solids, and in the barrel, they are mainly responsible for the flexing and bending motion we see as "barrel whip" or "barrel oscillation."
Both types of waves happen simultaneously within milliseconds, bouncing back and forth inside the barrel. This creates a complex vibration pattern called a resonance, which continues for the brief moment the bullet is still inside. Understanding these two kinds of waves -- how they start and how they affect the barrel -- helps explain why the barrel’s vibrational state at the moment of bullet exit is so critical to achieving the best precision possible.

Image

S-Waves and P-Waves visualized

To visualize this better, imagine the barrel as a spring or a tuning fork that’s been struck... now imagine it being struck by the explosive force of a bullet shot. It oscillates in complex ways (bending in multiple modes), but for simplicity, think of the muzzle moving in a small up-and-down (or side-to-side) wave-like motion. This motion happens extremely fast – the bullet is only in the barrel for a few milliseconds – but it still matters: if the muzzle is at a different position or moving in a different direction each time a bullet exits, those bullets will start off on slightly different trajectories.

And if the bullet we use can affect the harmonic “tune” of the barrel, then, we can adjust just how accurate the barrel is…

The idea is that these sine waves – higher frequencies being shorter waves, and lower frequencies being longer waves – can be tuned to resonate best with the projectile of our choosing, with the goal for best accuracy being to have the muzzle in as consistent a position as possible at the moment the bullet leaves the barrel.

Ideally, you want each bullet to exit at a point in the barrel’s vibration cycle when the muzzle movement is minimal. In vibration terms, shooters often refer to this as a “node.” A node is a point in an oscillation that has little to no movement. If you’ve ever plucked a guitar string, the points along the string that don’t seem to move are nodes. In a rifle barrel, one of the nodes we care about is when the muzzle’s vertical (or lateral) motion momentarily pauses or is at an extreme before changing direction.
Image
In practical terms, this is why certain loads “shoot tighter” in a given rifle than others. For example, one type of ammo might consistently produce muzzle velocities that time nicely with the barrel’s vibrations, always letting the bullet out when the muzzle is at a stable point. Another ammo, perhaps a bit faster or slower, might dump bullets out when the muzzle is in the middle of a swing, leading to larger groups. Precision hand-loaders leverage this by adjusting their powder charge or bullet seating depth to tune the dwell time (the time the bullet spends in the barrel) so that it matches up with a favorable point in the barrel’s oscillation. This process is often called finding an “accuracy node” or harmonic tuning. The key idea is to have the bullet exit the barrel as it (the barrel) is moving the slowest, which yields more consistent shot placement.

This is also why the initial muzzle velocity of a round affects both accuracy and precision.

If a bullet can exit at that calm pause (the top or bottom of the wave), small differences in bullet speed or timing won’t translate into big differences in muzzle position. But if a bullet exits while the muzzle is moving rapidly (mid-swing), even a tiny change in bullet travel time can mean the muzzle was at a slightly different angle, throwing the shot off. To imagine this, picture the barrel's muzzle moving in a smooth sine wave after a shot is initially fired, and it begins to travel down the barrel. The goal is for the bullet to exit the barrel when the muzzle is at a "node" -- the peak or trough of the wave -- where movement is minimal.
  • If the bullet exits at a node (moment of minimal movement), small changes in bullet speed or ignition timing have very little effect on point of impact.
  • If the bullet exits mid-swing (while the muzzle is moving fastest), even slight differences in bullet speed or timing can cause significant shifts in where the bullet strikes.
A simple way to picture this is by comparing two bullets:
  • Bullet A exits at the top of the wave (calm point) — highly consistent impact.
  • Bullet B exits mid-wave (muzzle whipping) — wider dispersion on target.
This relationship between barrel movement and bullet exit timing is why matching bullet mass, powder burn rate, and consistency matters so much.
Image

Importantly, ammunition characteristics directly determine when during the barrel's seismic oscillation cycle the bullet exits:
  • Bullet Weight and Length: Heavier and longer bullets exhibit greater inertia and generally dwell longer in the barrel compared to lighter, shorter bullets. This delayed exit timing interacts with the barrel's vibrational pattern, meaning that a barrel optimized for moderate dwell times may inherently favor specific bullet weight ranges to achieve maximum accuracy. Bullets with a higher length-to-diameter ratio will generally require more precise harmonization with the barrel's oscillations.

  • Bullet Shape and Construction: Projectiles with higher sectional density or different material compositions, such as monolithic copper solids versus traditional lead-core bullets, may alter how internal stresses propagate along the barrel during travel. This can influence both the effective dwell time and the interaction with the barrel's vibrational nodes, subtly affecting exit dynamics.

  • Powder Type and Charge Weight: Fast-burning powders accelerate bullets to peak velocities quickly, resulting in shorter dwell times and earlier exits in the oscillation cycle. Conversely, slower-burning powders prolong gas expansion, extending the bullet's presence in the barrel. The burn rate, peak pressure, and total energy output of the powder must be carefully selected to ensure that bullet exit timing aligns naturally with a favorable phase in the barrel's harmonic oscillation. Choosing powders that match the barrel's natural frequency profile enhances the rifle's overall precision.

  • Velocity Consistency: Research by Bryan Litz in "Applied Ballistics" underscores that minimizing muzzle velocity variation (ΔV) is critical to achieving precision. Greater velocity consistency ensures that shot-to-shot timing variability is minimized, meaning that bullets consistently exit during the same phase of the barrel's harmonic oscillation. Even a small increase in standard deviation of velocity (SDV) can introduce measurable dispersion at long distances due to variations in launch angle caused by differential muzzle movement.
Rather than attempting to artificially adjust the barrel itself post-fabrication, real-world shooters and load developers achieve harmonic optimization by tailoring the load to complement the barrel’s inherent behavior. Barrel oscillations are predictable, repeatable, and largely influenced by internal ballistics parameters rather than external interventions. Understanding this predictability allows a shooter to fine-tune ballistic performance by selecting the ideal combination of bullet, powder, and primer to work in synergy with the natural behavior of their specific barrel.

In practical terms, optimizing barrel harmonics for field rifles like the HK MR762 involves several interconnected strategies:
  • Selecting bullet weights and designs that the barrel’s twist rate, profile, and length naturally stabilize.
  • Choosing powders and charges that align bullet exit timing with the barrel’s vibration cycle and nodes.
  • Ensuring consistent ignition through carefully selected primers and precise cartridge assembly.
  • Prioritizing consistent muzzle velocities and minimizing pressure variability across rounds.
  • Maintaining repeatable shooting fundamentals to avoid introducing disruptive external forces.
By understanding and managing these factors, shooters can extract maximum precision from their systems without relying on mechanical tuning devices (like barrel tuners used by benchrest shooters). True performance comes from ballistic discipline, consistent ammunition, and working within the rifle’s natural behavior.

The HK MR762’s 16.5” barrel strikes a balance between stiffness and velocity. Pairing it with carefully selected match-grade ammunition -- typically 168- to 175-grain high-BC projectiles using temperature-stable powders -- allows the platform to achieve excellent field precision. Its stout barrel contour promotes predictable harmonic behavior, enabling consistent sub-MOA performance across a wide range of environments and mission profiles.

Tuning the load to the barrel’s natural resonance enhances not just precision but also resilience to environmental shifts like temperature, humidity, or barometric pressure. A rifle and ammunition combination aligned in harmonic behavior is less sensitive to external variation. Ultimately, precision at the field level depends on consistent management of projectile mass, velocity, powder characteristics, barrel timing, and shooting technique. Real-world accuracy stems not from brute force intervention but from synergy: honoring the rifle’s natural dynamics rather than fighting them.

3.4 - Twist Rate and Bullet Stability (Gyroscopic vs. Harmonics)

Now let’s talk about twist rate and how it relates to this discussion. Twist rate is completely separate from barrel length or harmonics – it refers to how fast the rifling spins the bullet. In a rifle barrel, spiral grooves (rifling) impart spin to the bullet for stability, much like how a quarterback puts a spin on a football. Twist rate is usually given as a ratio, e.g. “1:10” means one full turn of rifling in 10 inches of barrel. A “faster” twist (numerically lower ratio like 1:8) spins the bullet more rapidly, and a “slower” twist (like 1:12) spins it less.

Bullet gyroscopic stability is crucial for accuracy. If a bullet isn’t spun fast enough, it will not remain pointed forward in flight – it may yaw, tumble, or “keyhole” into the target sideways. This obviously wrecks accuracy. A properly stabilized bullet, on the other hand, flies true, with its tip forward, and follows a predictable trajectory. The twist rate needed to stabilize a bullet depends on the bullet’s length, weight, and shape (longer bullets need more spin than short ones, because they tend to be aerodynamically less stable). For example, a short, fat projectile (like a round lead musket ball or a pistol bullet) is easy to stabilize and works with very slow twist rates (e.g. 1:48 was common for musket balls). But a long, sleek bullet (like modern long-range boat-tail bullets) requires a faster twist – for instance, the military 5.56 mm NATO rifles moved to a 1:7 twist to stabilize heavy 62–77 gr bullets, whereas older 1:12 twists were fine for lighter 55 gr bullets.

In the context of the HK MR762 (.308 caliber), typical bullet weights range from 147 gr (M80 ball ammo) up to 175–180 gr for match-grade ammo, and even 190–200 gr in some specialty loads. These heavier bullets are longer and need a sufficient twist to stabilize. Many .308 barrels, to include the MR762, use a 1:11″ twist, which is enough to stabilize those common bullet weights at the velocities the rifle produces. If the twist were too slow (say 1:15″), those longer bullets would wobble or tumble. If it’s faster (say 1:10″ or 1:8″), it will definitely stabilize them; you generally cannot over-stabilize to the point of making the bullet immediately inaccurate (over-stabilization mostly has very subtle effects like slightly increased drag or spin drift, but nothing drastic for typical twists). The key is that the twist is sufficient to gyroscopically stabilize the bullet.

It’s important to differentiate stability vs. harmonics: Twist rate (stability) affects how the bullet flies after it leaves the barrel, whereas barrel harmonics affect the barrel’s position at the moment the bullet leaves. These are related only in that an unstable (poorly spun) bullet will be inaccurate no matter what, even if your barrel timing was perfect; and a stable bullet could still group poorly if your barrel whip is throwing off the muzzle angle each shot. Both need to be in a good place for best precision. Think of stability as ensuring the bullet doesn’t wobble in flight, and harmonics as ensuring it launches from the barrel in a consistent orientation.

Bryan Litz, in Applied Ballistics, emphasizes getting the stability factor right (often using the Miller stability formula or similar to ensure an adequate safety margin in twist rate). He also investigated things like whether a faster twist might reduce muzzle velocity (because imparting spin takes a bit of energy). The findings show that while there is a small effect, it’s minor – a faster twist barrel might shave a tiny amount off velocity compared to a slower twist, but we’re talking on the order of a few feet per second, which for practical purposes isn’t a big concern. In other words, don’t be afraid of a fast twist; erring on the side of too much spin is usually better than not enough. For the MR762, H&K chose a twist that will handle the heavy bullets (for long-range effectiveness), and it will also stabilize lighter ones. This ensures any standard .308/7.62 NATO round you feed it will come out spinning true.

In summary on this point: gyroscopic stabilization (twist rate) keeps the bullet flying straight, and is a prerequisite for accuracy. Barrel harmonics (vibration control) keep the muzzle pointed straight during the bullet’s exit, which is also critical for accuracy. They are two separate phenomena – one is the bullet’s internal stability, the other is the firearm’s consistency – and a precision shooter pays attention to both.

Image

The author chronographing various rounds using an
Accuracy International AT308 with 24" 1:12 twist barrel

3.5 - Putting It All Together: Consistency is King

To achieve tight groups and predictable long-range performance, all these elements must work together. Here’s how they interact and what a shooter can do about it:
  • Barrel Length & Profile: A longer barrel can give you more velocity (good for distance), but will flex more. A shorter or heavier (thicker) barrel flexes less, making it easier to find a consistent harmonic sweet spot. The MR762’s designers opted for a moderately short, thick barrel to ensure stiffness. In practice, this means the rifle might be slightly easier to shoot accurately (less sensitive to load variations) at the expense of some velocity. If your goal is extreme long-range with .308, a 20″+ barrel might be chosen for velocity – but for most uses under ~800 meters, the 16″ barrel with modern high-BC bullets will do the job with proper ballistic compensation.

  • Muzzle Velocity & Bullet Weight: These two go hand in hand. Lighter bullets generally fly faster; heavier bullets are slower (given the same cartridge and powder capacity). A heavier bullet staying longer in the barrel means the timing of exit is a bit later. Depending on your barrel’s harmonic pattern, a different weight bullet (or a different load) can shift the bullet’s exit timing relative to that oscillation. This is why you might find your rifle prefers, say, 168 gr bullets over 150 gr, or vice versa. It’s not just about weight – the velocity difference matters too. The combination of bullet mass and velocity (along with powder burn characteristics) determines the dwell time. As a shooter, you can experiment with various bullet weights or ammo brands to see which consistently gives tightest groups. Those that do are likely exiting on a favorable part of the vibration cycle. If you handload, you have even more ability to tweak velocity to hit that node. On the flip side, don’t obsess over it – a lot of factory match ammo today is made to be pretty consistent, and many rifles shoot well with a range of ammo. If your MR762 groups, say, 1 MOA with one kind of match ammo and 1.5 MOA with another, it could be due to harmonic timing – and you’d naturally prefer the one that groups 1 MOA.

  • Twist Rate & Bullet Choice: Ensure you’re using bullet types that your barrel’s twist can stabilize. Fortunately, most off-the-shelf rifles pair twist rates appropriately to common bullet lengths. The MR762 will handle typical 147–185 gr bullets with ease. If you were to shoot an unusually long bullet (like certain very long 200+ grain subsonic bullets or monolithic solids), you’d want to verify stability. An unstable bullet pattern (keyholes on paper) is a sign you need a faster twist or a different bullet. But assuming stability is a given (which it is in the MR762 with normal ammo), you then focus on the other factors like harmonics and load consistency.

  • Consistency and External Factors: Everything about accuracy boils down to consistency. The rifle should behave the same way shot to shot. That means using good shooting fundamentals and ammo that produces consistent muzzle velocity and exit conditions. Barrel harmonics tie into this because we want consistent exit timing; the shooter’s job is also to ensure consistent hold and trigger press so as not to introduce extra movement. Notably, recoil begins while the bullet is still in the barrel, especially in a high-caliber like .308. Any pressure from your shoulder, bipod, or sling that influences the barrel or rifle before the bullet exits can effectively change the harmonic behavior or aim point. This is why you’ll hear about techniques like not “muscling” the rifle and using a repeatable rest or hold – you want each shot to disrupt the barrel as little as possible and in the same way every time.

  • Real-World Example – MR762 DMR scenario: Let’s say you’re engaging targets at 600 meters. A 175 gr bullet from a 16.5″ barrel might leave around 2,450 ft/s, whereas from a 20″ it might be 2,600 ft/s (these are ballpark figures). At 600 m, the difference in drop might be several inches more for the slower round, and a bit more wind drift, but both are quite manageable with scope adjustments. If the 16.5″ barrel rifle is easier to shoot consistently (due to less barrel movement and perhaps easier handling), you might actually hit the target more reliably, even though on paper you gave up some velocity. The shorter barrel rifle might also be less sensitive to slight powder charge variations – a benefit if using surplus or mixed lot ammo. Meanwhile, the twist rate in both barrels is the same, stabilizing the bullet well, so no issues there. The bottom line: the shooter with the shorter, stiffer barrel might find it “forgiving” and easy to get good groups, whereas the longer barrel shooter must be sure their load is tuned and their fundamentals spot on to realize the theoretical accuracy (in most cases, both can shoot excellently, but this illustrates the trade-off).
In field terms, many experienced shooters find that there is such a thing as a rifle that’s easy to shoot well. Often those rifles have a good balance of the above factors: a well-chosen barrel length and profile, a suitable twist, and a load that harmonizes well. They’re not finicky. By contrast, a rifle pushing extremes (like an ultra-lightweight long barrel or using bullets at the edge of stability) might be more finicky – you have to get everything just right to extract the best accuracy.

Finally, remember that accuracy isn’t solely determined by one factor. Velocity, barrel harmonics, twist, bullet weight – they all matter, but only in combination. A great barrel with poor ammo will disappoint, just as great ammo in a flawed barrel might. The MR762 happens to give up some muzzle velocity compared to longer rifles, but it gains a lot in portability and likely very consistent behavior. For a shooter using it from 0 to 600+ meters, that consistency translates to confidence: you know that if you do your part, the rifle will put the rounds where they need to go.

3.6 - Conclusion

Balancing velocity and harmonics is about recognizing the trade-offs. Higher velocity (from longer barrels) helps with trajectory, but too much length can introduce more vibration. Good barrel design can mitigate that. Barrel harmonics teach us that when the bullet exits can be as important as how fast it exits, in terms of where it lands. By ensuring your bullet exits during a calm point in the barrel’s oscillation (either through ammunition tuning or barrel tuning), you improve precision. Meanwhile, matching your barrel’s twist to your bullet ensures the projectile remains stable in flight, so it can take advantage of that precision.

So, it is clear how important it is to understand the relationship between a projectile's velocity, and a barrel's harmonics, to ensure the weapon system offers the greatest precision it is capable of. Barrel harmonics directly impact the precision and accuracy of a weapon system.

Image


The author's H&K 2022 MFD MR762 LRPIII with newer gas block, clearly and effectively cycling Hornady TAP ELD AR 168gr, and producing 1/2 MOA 3-round shot groups. This is on par with the H&K PSG-1, which is an incredible feat , and especially at its price range.

Image



* * *
4. ANALYSIS OF THE NEW MEDIUM CONTOUR MR762

In 2021, Heckler & Koch transitioned the MR762 rifle line to a medium contour barrel, a change that paralleled the U.S. Army’s shift toward lighter-weight precision rifles. This decision, while initially driven by contract requirements for the M110A1 SDMR program, also simplified HK’s manufacturing processes by allowing barrel blanks to be produced on a unified assembly line.

The 2021+ MR762 now features a redesigned gas block with tighter machining tolerances, as confirmed by HK Senior Engineering Technician Jesse Teague. These adjustments improve gas flow consistency, which is especially beneficial when using a variety of commercial .308 match-grade loads. The updated gas system maximizes cycling reliability across a broader spectrum of ammunition—addressing one of the platform's earlier sensitivities.

Operational Advantages and Considerations

The new medium contour barrel offers both pros and cons, depending on how the rifle is employed. When treated as a match rifle, the lighter barrel contour allows for faster cooling between strings of fire, and reduces overall system weight – an advantage for field carry and dynamic shooting positions. However, when used in a combat role or high-volume scenario, the thinner profile may lead to faster heat buildup, potentially introducing thermal shift and impacting sustained precision.

It is important to emphasize that the MR762 remains built from the same high-grade cannon steel, and the metallurgy of the barrel still supports rigorous use. The change is purely in external geometry and heat-mass distribution – not in the material’s ability to resist erosion or stress.

Thermal Characteristics of the Contoured Barrel

A lighter barrel has a lower total heat capacity due to reduced mass and surface area. Because of this, it heats up faster under sustained fire, but also cools more rapidly during pauses. For example, if both a light and heavy barrel are brought to 250°F, the lighter barrel will cool down to 100°F more quickly under identical environmental conditions. In practical terms, this means fewer rounds are needed to induce significant heat buildup in a lighter barrel – but recovery between strings of fire is also faster.

In the context of a Designated Marksman Rifle (DMR) role – where the expected firing rate is relatively low and controlled – this faster thermal cycling is unlikely to present issues during normal use. Moreover, HK’s MR762 barrels are forged from steel with a high molybdenum content, known for its superior heat resistance and long-term durability (see Part 1, Section 6).

Thus, if the medium contour barrel meets the accuracy standard and tolerates the DMR's anticipated emergency firing cycles, the weight savings are a reasonable trade-off. The reduction in barrel mass translates to a lighter overall weapon system, which improves mobility and handling without meaningfully sacrificing the MR762’s core precision attributes.

Personal Perspective on Contour Selection

From a shooter’s standpoint, the shift to a lighter barrel is not without compromise. If given the option, I would continue to select the heavy barrel for its superior harmonic stability and heat absorption characteristics—especially for long-range precision or suppressed use. That said, I do not believe the medium contour barrel is inherently less capable. Rather, it is optimized for a different mission set.

In the near future, I plan to build out a dedicated marksman configuration around the new medium contour MR762 to fully evaluate its accuracy, harmonic behavior, and operational balance. Only through real-world use can we properly assess the trade-offs – and potential – of this updated platform design.

* * *

Image

5. HK's FRENCH CANNON GRADE STEEL - AUBERT & DUVAL
First draft completed 17NOV24, Latest draft completed 25NOV24

Heckler & Koch uses Aubert & Duval -- a French military defense company -- for the barrel blanks then cut and shaped by HK. For 70 years, Aubert & Duval has been serving the defense market, mainly by producing forgings and long product parts for small, medium and heavy gun barrels, missile casings, critical parts for submarines, and turbine disks for military aircraft engines and space rockets. Constantly seeking to meet customer’s demands, Aubert & Duval is committed to supporting the defence industry.

Heckler & Koch uses a secret & proprietary blend of steel made exclusively for them, based on ARMAD steel developed specifically for small caliber gun barrels. This was confirmed by a peer in the community with direct relations to Aubert & Duval. For the sake of argument, we will be using ARMAD as the benchmark to compare Heckler & Koch barrels to others used for military and precision use, as it is the closest metric we have.

ARMAD is a steel grade and complex alloy design based on Aubert & Duval 3% Cr GKH® steel that offers robust toughness due to optimized chemical composition and control of the key parameters for melting and processing. This results in higher tensile strength values allowing designers to reduce weight while maintaining safety, even in extreme conditions. It contains very low residual elements due to the state-of-the-art steel making process control, and consists of the following elements in specific ratios that each contribute specific properties to the alloy:
  • Carbon (C): Increases hardness and strength. 0.35%
  • Silicon (Si): Enhances strength and improves oxidation resistance. 0.2%
  • Manganese (Mn): Improves strength and toughness, and helps with deoxidation. 0.25%
  • Sulfur (S): High levels of sulfur can cause embrittlement, making the alloy more prone to cracking and failure under stress. Embrittlement refers to a reduction in the ductility and toughness of the metal, making it more prone to cracking and failure under stress 0.001%
  • Phosphorus (P): Increases strength and improves corrosion resistance. Phosphorus can improve atmospheric corrosion resistance, but high levels can lead to intergranular corrosion, especially in heat-treated steels. 0.005%
  • Nickel (Ni): Enhances toughness, strength, and corrosion resistance. 0.3%
  • Chromium (Cr): Provides excellent corrosion resistance and hardness. 3.2%
  • Molybdenum (Mo): Increases strength and improves resistance to pitting corrosion. 1.2%
  • Vanadium (V): Enhances strength, toughness, and wear resistance. 0.35%
Optimized molybdenum (Mo) content (around 1%) improves mechanical properties after quenching and tempering heat treatment, and increases the steel’s hardenability.
Molybdenum is a powerful element in alloys for several key reasons:
  1. Strength and Hardness: Molybdenum significantly increases the strength and hardness of the alloy. It helps in maintaining high strength at elevated temperatures, making the alloy suitable for high-stress applications.
  2. Corrosion Resistance: It enhances the alloy’s resistance to corrosion, especially pitting and crevice corrosion in chloride environments. This makes it valuable in environments where the alloy is exposed to corrosive substances.
  3. Toughness: Molybdenum improves the toughness of the alloy, which is its ability to absorb energy and deform without fracturing. This is crucial for applications where the material is subjected to mechanical stresses.
  4. Wear Resistance: It increases the wear resistance of the alloy, which is important in applications where the material undergoes repeated friction and abrasion.
  5. Creep Resistance: Molybdenum enhances the alloy’s resistance to creep, which is the tendency to deform permanently under constant stress at high temperatures.
Molybdenum contributes significantly to the mechanical and chemical properties of the alloy, making it more robust and versatile for various demanding applications.

Gun barrels are designed to withstand the high pressures and temperatures generated during firing. High yield strength levels (both at room and elevated temperature) combined with good ductility and toughness are required. Increased hardness and higher tempering temperatures improve barrel life because:
  • It reduced wear in critical areas of the barrel
  • It improves resistance to heat related wear as a result of higher tempering temperature
  • The higher strength material allows for reduction in barrel thickness and overall system weight
ARMAD can be cold hammer forged with deformation up to 40% without loss of ductility. Chamber and barrel can be forged in same operation for an increased hardness in the chamber.

Benefits to Heckler & Koch using ARMAD grade steel:
  • ARMAD® has been designed to maintain ductility at cold forging percentage reduction beyond 30%
  • Hammer forging the chamber and the bore in the same operation results in more cold working and higher hardness in the chamber
  • Use fatigue/strength upgrading opportunities of ARMAD® to design lighter barrels with thinner wall sections
  • During hammer forging, ARMAD®’s homogeneous microstructure insures consistency in the formation of rifling and chamber
  • Better tempering resistance for ARMAD® compared to former 3%Cr steel grades:
    • Increases softening temperature thereby improving resistance to high bore temperatures
    • Improving resistance to higher temperature propellant
* * *​

5.1 - Comparing ARMAD steel to Military Spec 4150/CMV

Now, it is important to compare ARMAD to industry standard 4140 and 4150 barrels used from manufacturers like Colt and Daniel Defense. The “40” in 4140 is specific to the amount of carbon in the alloy. Generally it is near .40%. Likewise the “50” in 4150 steel is an indicator that the barrel steel has a carbon content near .50%. And 11595 barrel steel (Mil-Spec) gets its additional strengthening properties over the common commercial 4140 by one of two ways: more carbon in the steel or more carbon with the addition of Vanadium.

General 4150 steel compositions are as follows:

ORD 4150 Steel ORD 4150 ResulferizedChrome-Moly Vanadium (CMV)
ElementPercent %Percent %Percent %
Carbon0.48-0.550.47-0.550.41-0.49
Manganese0.75-1.00.70-1.00.60-0.90
Phosphorous0.0400.0400.040
Sulfur0.0400.05-0.090.040
Silicon0.20-0.350.20-0.350.20-0.35
Chromium0.80-1.100.80-1.150.80-1.15
Molybdenum0.15-0.250.15-0.250.30-0.40
Vanadium0.20-0.30

When purchasing steel from a mill the certification paperwork and other relevant paperwork usually lists a “Grade” of steel and then adds further details under the heading of “Specifications”. For a Mil-Spec barrel steel; that specification would be listed as MIL-B-11595E. This is to say that not all 4150 steels are considered Mil-Spec. In order for it to be Mil-Spec it would need to be a 4150 grade AND it would have to comply with the specifications listed in 11595.

Table One (listed above) shows three types of chemical compositions and ranges for Mil-Spec 4150 barrel steel as defined by 11595. ORD4150, ORD4150-Resulfurized, and Chrome-Moly-Vanadium (CMV) should not be confused with the generic term of a Chrome Moly barrel. The opinion of the US Government (as defined by the Mil-Spec) is that one of the three is not better than the others. They are all the same, and are all to be considered 11595 (Mil-Spec) barrel steel. For the purpose of our analysis, we will refer to all of the above as CMV.

Colt, for example, uses CMV in their SOCOM barrels, which are famously used in the M4A1 Block II. A member of AR15 was kind enough to send in a Colt SOCOM barrel in for destructive analysis, and the results were as follows:

ElementGun Barrel (Percent %)CMV Requirements (%)
Carbon0.440.41-0.49
Manganese0.760.60-0.90
Phosphorus0.0120.040
Sulfur0.0240.040
Silicon0.290.20-0.35
Chromium0.920.8-0.15
Nickel0.21-
Molybdenum0.330.30-0.40
Aluminum0.029-
Copper0.019-
Vanadium0.2490.20-0.30
Titanium0.001-

This shared, let's compare ARMAD HK MR762 barrel to a Colt CMV barrel:

ElementHK ARMAD (%)Colt CMV (%)
Carbon0.30-0.350.44
Manganese0.250.76
Phosphorus0.0050.012
Sulfur0.0010.024
Silicon0.200.29
Chromium0.28-0.320.92
Nickel0.300.21
Molybdenum0.70-1.20.33
Aluminum-0.029
Copper-0.019
Vanadium0.15-0.350.249
Titanium-0.001

This information provided, lets break down an analysis of the two:
  • Carbon: Colt CMV has higher carbon content, leading to greater hardness and strength but potentially more brittleness.
  • Manganese: Higher in the Colt CMV, enhancing strength and toughness more than the ARMAD.
  • Phosphorus and Sulfur: ARMAD has much lower contents, which is beneficial for ductility and reducing embrittlement.
  • Silicon: Similar in both, contributing to strength and oxidation resistance.
  • Chromium: Higher in the Colt CMV, giving it better corrosion resistance.
  • Nickel: Slightly higher in ARMAD, which can improve toughness and corrosion resistance.
  • Molybdenum: Significantly higher in ARMAD, greatly enhancing strength, pitting corrosion resistance, and higher temperature performance.
  • Vanadium: Higher in ARMAD, improving strength and wear resistance.
  • Aluminum, Copper, Titanium: Present in the Colt CMV, contributing additional strength, corrosion resistance, and machinability benefits.
ARMAD also has a lower silicon and manganese content which improves the balance between strength and toughness compared to 4150 or CMV and can offer several benefits:
  1. Improved Ductility: High silicon content can make the alloy brittle, reducing its ability to deform without breaking. Lower silicon content helps maintain ductility, making the alloy more flexible and less prone to cracking.
  2. Enhanced Toughness: Manganese can increase the strength and hardness of an alloy, but too much manganese can lead to brittleness. Reducing manganese content can help balance strength and toughness, making the alloy more durable under stress.
  3. Better Weldability: High levels of silicon and manganese can negatively affect the weldability of an alloy. Lowering their content can improve the alloy's ability to be welded without defects.
  4. Reduced Segregation: Lower manganese content can reduce the tendency for centerline segregation during solidification, leading to a more uniform and consistent microstructure.
Now the age old question: do Heckler & Koch ARMAD barrels need to be chrome lined to prevent corrosion and rust resistance? The presence of elements like chromium and molybdenum play a critical role. Between the two alloys:
  • Colt CMV has 0.92% chromium and 0.33% molybdenum.
  • HK ARMAD has 0.32% chromium but a higher 1.2% molybdenum.
Chromium is a key element that forms a passive oxide layer on the surface, preventing further rust. However, molybdenum enhances this protection, especially against pitting and crevice corrosion, which are common in chloride-rich environments.

Given these compositions, Colt CMV has a higher chromium content, which directly contributes to rust resistance. However, HK ARMAD has a significantly higher molybdenum content, providing excellent resistance to more aggressive forms of corrosion, such as pitting. That said...

No: your Heckler & Koch MR762 and MR556 barrels do not need to be chrome lined to protect it.

In a highly humid environment, for example of concern, the performance of a rifle barrel depends on its resistance to corrosion and its ability to maintain mechanical properties over time. Here's how the two barrels might perform:

Colt CMV SOCOM Barrel:
  • Chromium (0.92%): Provides excellent corrosion resistance, forming a protective oxide layer.
  • Molybdenum (0.33%): Enhances resistance to pitting and crevice corrosion.
  • Phosphorus (0.012%): Improves corrosion resistance but in low amounts.
  • Sulfur (0.024%): Can reduce ductility and toughness, potentially making it more susceptible to stress corrosion cracking.
Heckler & Koch MR762 ARMAD Barrel:
  • Molybdenum (1.2%): Significantly enhances resistance to pitting and crevice corrosion, making it very effective in humid environments.
  • Chromium (0.32%): Provides some corrosion resistance but less than CMV.
  • Phosphorus (0.005%): Low amount, contributing minimally to corrosion resistance.
  • Sulfur (0.001%): Very low, reducing the risk of embrittlement and stress corrosion cracking.
Summary:
  • CMV has higher chromium content, which generally provides better overall corrosion resistance.
  • ARMAD has a much higher molybdenum content, which is particularly effective against pitting and crevice corrosion in humid environments.
CMV might perform better in terms of general corrosion resistance, while ARMAD would excel in environments where pitting and crevice corrosion are major concerns. The Colt CMV SOCOM barrel appears to be geared towards overall strength, toughness, and general corrosion resistance, while the Heckler & Koch MR762 ARMAD barrel focuses heavily on high-temperature performance, strength, extreme environment corrosion resistance and reduced embrittlement.

* * *​

5.2 - Comparing ARMAD steel to 416R Stainless Steel

I was curious about how the MR762 barrels compared to a standard Proof precision barrel that uses 416R Stainless Steel. Ultimately, the high molybdenum content of ARMAD steel is what gives it the strength and longevity that HK rifle barrels are known for. But 416R has its own advantages based on the balance of chromium, manganese, silicon, and molybdenum. In a way, it isn't better or worse, but 'different'—and that difference proves beneficial to marksmen due to the machinability of it, and the ability to produce aerospace-grade precision in their construction.

416R stainless steel is considered martensitic stainless steel, meaning it is heat-treatable to high hardness levels and forms a microstructure known as martensite when cooled rapidly from high temperatures. This microstructure is what gives it a unique balance of strength, wear resistance, and machinability -- all of which are ideal traits for precision barrels. Unlike austenitic stainless steels, which are more corrosion-resistant but softer and harder to machine, martensitic steels like 416R can be cut with tighter tolerances and finished with better surface uniformity, which directly supports sub-MOA accuracy in high-end barrels.

Here's a breakdown of its key elements and how they impact its properties:

ElementPercentageBenefitsDrawbacks
Carbon (C)0.12%Increases hardness and strengthCan reduce ductility
Chromium (Cr)12.50%Enhances corrosion resistanceCan increase brittleness
Manganese (Mn)0.40%Improves strength and toughnessCan affect machinability
Phosphorus (P)0.03%Enhances strengthCan reduce ductility
Sulfur (S)0.13%Improves machinabilityReduces weldability and corrosion resistance
Silicon (Si)0.40%Enhances strengthCan affect machinability
Molybdenum (Mo)0.40%Increases hardness and corrosion resistanceCan increase cost

416R stainless steel is particularly popular in precision rifle barrels due to its combination of machinability and strength. Here’s a bit more detail on how the elements in 416R stainless steel work together to create its unique properties:

How Elements Interact in 416R Stainless Steel
  1. Iron (Fe):
    • The primary component, iron, forms the matrix of the steel and contributes to the overall strength and magnetic properties of the alloy.
  2. Carbon (C):
    • Carbon combines with iron to form carbides, which increase hardness and strength. However, higher carbon content can reduce ductility and toughness.
  3. Chromium (Cr):
    • Chromium is essential for forming a passive oxide layer on the steel surface, which enhances corrosion resistance. It also helps in achieving martensitic structure which is necessary for hardening.
  4. Manganese (Mn):
    • Manganese acts as a deoxidizer and desulfurizer, improving the steel's strength and toughness. It also helps in refining the grain structure.
  5. Phosphorus (P) and Sulfur (S):
    • These elements improve machinability. Sulfur, particularly, forms manganese sulfides, which create inclusions that act as chip breakers during machining. However, they can impair weldability and reduce corrosion resistance.
  6. Silicon (Si):
    • Silicon is added to increase strength and enhance the steel’s hardness. It also aids in deoxidizing the steel.
  7. Molybdenum (Mo):
    • Molybdenum increases hardness, particularly at high temperatures, and improves corrosion resistance. It works well in combination with chromium.
Interaction and Resulting Properties
  • Machinability: The inclusion of sulfur greatly enhances the machinability of 416R stainless steel, making it easier to machine and shape. This is crucial for applications like precision rifle barrels. From my analysis, it is a balancing act to use as little sulfer as possible, while still having just enough to keep it machineable. This percentage is what will make or break a quality barrel.
  • Corrosion Resistance: Chromium and molybdenum together provide a good level of resistance to rust and corrosion, though not as high as some austenitic stainless steels. By having the Chromium built into the barrel itself, lining becomes a moot point.
  • Strength and Hardness: The presence of carbon, chromium, and molybdenum helps in achieving a strong and hard structure, especially after heat treatment.
  • Ductility and Weldability: The addition of sulfur and phosphorus, while beneficial for machinability, can reduce ductility and weldability, making the steel less flexible and more challenging to weld.
By carefully balancing these elements, 416R stainless steel offers a unique combination of machinability, strength, and corrosion resistance, making it highly suitable for applications requiring precision and durability.

Interestingly, ARMAD steel -- while proprietary -- is believed to be martensitic or at least capable of forming a martensitic structure through heat treatment. This aligns with its high surface hardness, exceptional thermal stability, and long-term accuracy retention. While its exact composition remains undisclosed, its behavior under use suggests it's engineered for similar strength and wear resistance as 416R, but with better heat endurance due to increased molybdenum.

Comparing the composition of ARMAD Steel with 416R stainless steel:

ElementARMAD Steel416R Stainless SteelImpact on Properties
Carbon (C)0.35%0.12%Higher carbon in ARMAD Steel increases hardness and strength but reduces ductility.
Chromium (Cr)3.2%12.50%416R has higher corrosion resistance due to more chromium.
Manganese (Mn)-0.40%Manganese improves strength and toughness in 416R.
Phosphorus (P)0.005%0.03%Both have low phosphorus, but 416R's slightly higher amount could reduce ductility more.
Sulfur (S)0.001%0.13%ARMAD Steel has less sulfur, improving weldability and corrosion resistance but reducing machinability.
Silicon (Si)0.2%0.40%416R benefits more from silicon's strength and hardness improvement.
Nickel (Ni)0.3%-Nickel in ARMAD Steel enhances toughness and corrosion resistance.
Molybdenum (Mo)1.2%0.40%ARMAD Steel has more molybdenum, which increases hardness and corrosion resistance.
Vanadium (V)0.35%-Vanadium in ARMAD Steel increases strength, wear resistance, and hardness.

Comparative Properties:
  • Hardness and Strength: ARMAD Steel, with higher carbon and the addition of vanadium, is likely to be harder and stronger compared to 416R stainless steel. The higher molybdenum content also contributes to this.
  • Corrosion Resistance: While 416R has more chromium, ARMAD Steel's combination of chromium, molybdenum, and nickel provides good corrosion resistance but might not be as superior as 416R in highly corrosive environments.
  • Machinability: 416R is specifically designed for machinability due to its higher sulfur content, making it easier to cut and shape compared to ARMAD Steel.
  • Weldability: ARMAD Steel, with its very low sulfur content, would have better weldability than 416R, which suffers from porosity issues during welding.
  • Ductility: The higher carbon content in ARMAD Steel could reduce ductility compared to 416R, which might make it less flexible and more brittle under certain conditions.
  • Special Additions: The presence of vanadium and nickel in ARMAD Steel adds to its strength, toughness, and wear resistance, which could make it suitable for applications requiring these properties.
Each of these steels has its unique strengths and potential drawbacks based on their composition. The specific applications and requirements will determine which steel is more suitable for a given purpose. Let's compare Crucible 416R stainless steel and ARMAD steel in terms of their thermogenic properties and resistance to high heat stress:

Mechanical & Thermal Properties

PropertyARMAD SteelCrucible 416R Stainless
Hardness (Rockwell C)38–45 HRC (tempered)28–36 HRC (pre-hardened)
Yield Strength~1300 MPa~450 MPa
Ultimate Tensile Strength~1500 MPa~650 MPa
Impact Toughness (at -40C)~80 J (very high)Sufficient, but lower than ARMAD
Thermal Conductivity35.5 W/m·K~25 W/m·K
Coeff. of Thermal Expansion6.4 x 10^-6 /°C5.6 x 10^-6 /°C
Specific Heat Capacity460 J/kg·K460 J/kg·K
Max Safe Operating Temp~600°C~650–760°C

Summary
  • Thermogenic Properties: ARMAD steel has higher thermal conductivity and a slightly higher coefficient of thermal expansion compared to 416R stainless steel.
  • High Heat Stress Resistance: ARMAD steel offers better resistance to high heat stress and maintains its mechanical properties at higher temperatures compared to 416R stainless steel.
MR762’s ARMAD barrels are designed for abuse, offering greater strength, heat resistance, and wear tolerance. They excel in tactical scenarios, where round count and reliability under heat matter. Conversely, Bartlein’s Crucible 416R barrels (as used by Accuracy International) are optimized for consistent sub-MOA performance in clean, controlled environments. While less robust in sustained fire, they offer better machinability, superior corrosion resistance, and are easier to replace after service life.

For end users selecting between these platforms, the choice comes down to mission profile. Use ARMAD when you want the barrel to outlast the optic. Use Bartlein 416R when you want the most repeatable 5-shot group money can buy. So the question becomes, just how accurate is the MR762 compared to an Accuracy International?

* * *

Image

(Photo Courtesy of James Williamson of Teufelshund Tactical)

5.3 – Shaping a Heckler & Koch Barrel

At Heckler & Koch, the selected steel undergoes a multi-step process designed to produce a barrel that is not only safe and reliable but also precise under extreme conditions. The proprietary metallurgy and composition ensure that even under over-pressure conditions -- which might fracture lesser barrels -- H&K’s barrels remain intact and consistent in performance.

Cold Hammer Forging (CHF)

H&K Barrels are Cold Hammer Forged. In cold hammer forging, a barrel blank is securely positioned over a mandrel that defines the internal profile, including the lands and grooves of the rifling. High-pressure hammers repeatedly strike the exterior of the barrel blank, plastically deforming the metal and imprinting the rifling pattern. This process enhances both the durability and the consistency of the barrel. Notably, the M24 Sniper Weapon System barrels are manufactured using CHF, underscoring the method’s capacity to deliver exceptional performance and longevity under rigorous conditions.

Beyond contour and harmonics benefits, cold hammer forging also delivers significant metallurgical enhancements. The intense compressive forces involved refine and align the steel’s grain structure, yielding a denser, more uniform microstructure that enhances tensile strength and toughness. Such grain refinement also bolsters fatigue resistance by reducing initiation sites for microcracks, which is a key factor in barrel longevity. Research on cold-forged gun barrel steels (e.g., 30SiMn2MoVA) shows that cold forging increases strength and induces beneficial residual stresses, while HIP studies confirm enhanced fatigue performance near grain boundaries. These microstructural improvements translate into CHF barrels better resisting thermal cycling, wear, and harmonic-induced performance degradation under extended use.

Alternative Rifling Methods

While H&K employs cold hammer forging for their ARMAD steel barrels, two other rifling methods are often cited in precision barrel manufacturing:
  • Button Rifling ~ Button rifling involves a hardened tungsten-carbide “button” that carries the negative image of the desired rifling. This button is either pressed or pulled through a pre-drilled barrel blank under high pressure, engraving the grooves in a single pass with minimal material removal. Originally developed by Lothar-Walther and utilized by German manufacturers during World War II, this technique has historically been used in the production of LW barrels -- for instance, in Accuracy International’s Arctic Warfare AW308 models.

  • Cut Rifling ~ Cut rifling is a precision machining process in which individual grooves are cut into the barrel bore using a sharp cutter. This method creates highly uniform, stress-free grooves that typically yield the finest accuracy. Bartlein barrel blanks are crafted using cut rifling, and today, Accuracy International rifles often employ cut-rifled barrels to ensure consistent long-range performance.
Choosing the Appropriate Method for ARMAD Steel

Each rifling method has inherent strengths and drawbacks. Although cut rifling is often considered the ideal technique for achieving the most precisely defined grooves, it is not as feasible on ARMAD steel owing to the alloy’s toughness. As a result, a cold hammer forged H&K barrel may not match the theoretical accuracy of a 416R cut-rifled barrel. However, the benefits of CHF -- such as enhanced durability, increased thermal stability, and improved barrel life -- compensate for any minor compromises in groove precision. The design and tapering of the barrel further ensure excellent performance in the field.

The Barrel Manufacturing Process

After forging, the barrel undergoes several precise machining steps:
  1. Deep Drilling:
    The stock steel is mounted in a horizontal drill press and deep drilled from one end to the chamber diameter. During this step, the barrel rotates in one direction while the drill bit rotates in the opposite direction, ensuring a straight and centered bore.
  2. Reaming:
    The drilled stock is reamed to achieve the desired diameter and to smooth the internal surface, setting the stage for high-precision finishing.
  3. Diamond Honing:
    The reamed barrel is then diamond honed to produce a mirror-like finish on the bore. This process minimizes friction and aids in achieving consistent performance from the rifling during the break-in period.
  4. Mandrel Application:
    Finally, either a traditional “land & groove” or a polygonal mandrel is introduced to precisely define the rifling pattern, ensuring optimal accuracy and consistency.
Chrome Lining Considerations

A frequently asked question is why Heckler & Koch does not chrome line their barrels for the civilian market. The answer lies in the advanced design and metallurgy of the ARMAD steel barrels. In military contracts, chrome lining is often stipulated due to long-standing tradition rather than performance necessity. For civilian applications, chrome lining can sometimes hinder accuracy by introducing variable stresses in the barrel. Instead, the inherent corrosion resistance of ARMAD steel -- especially when paired with a Molybdenum Disulfide-based lubricant for cleaning -- renders chrome lining unnecessary, preserving the barrel’s precision and enhancing its longevity.

While the MR762A1’s unlined carbon steel barrel is optimized for peak accuracy, it does come with a trade-off in erosion resistance. Literature on barrel metallurgy suggests that stainless steel barrels generally resist throat erosion and heat-induced wear better -- though often at the expense of initial accuracy. Conversely, chrome lining can further extend service life but may compromise precision through uneven coating. Therefore, unlined carbon steel barrels like HK’s MR series of rifles prioritize tight grouping in favor of scheduled barrel replacements under heavy use.”

References:
Metal used in HK MR762 barrels: ARMAD® - Aubert & Duval English
PDF information with more details: ARMAD_next-generation-alloy-for-firearms_2024_compressed.pdf
Barrel Steel, AR15 Forum: Barrel Steel: 4150, 4140, Chrome Moly, Chrome Moly Vanadium - AR15.COM

* * *

With the fundamentals laid out, analysis of the different rifles and their abilities have context.

PART 2 IS BELOW . . .


 
#3 · (Edited)
* * * PART 2 * * *

REAL WORLD BALLISTICS OF THE
MR WEAPON SYSTEM FAMILY

We can categorize the MR762 family into the following categories:
  • 1. The HK Weapon System for Precision - Barrel Break-in & Maintenance
  • 2. Understanding the Standard - The PSG-1
  • 3. The HK417 & G28 DMRs - A Response to the Global War on Terror
  • 4. The G28 DMR – Evolution of a Precision Rifle
  • 5. First Generation MR762 - Teething Issues
  • 6. Late Generation MR762 - New Machining and Modern Reform
  • 7. Medium Contour MR762 - The Weight Loss
  • 8. The M110A1 - The Culmination for the Everyday Marksman
  • 9. The MR762 A4 - The New Kid on the Block

1. The HK Weapon System for Precision -
Barrel Break-in, Barrel Conditioning, and Maintenance


When first introduced, the MR762 was considered a "high strung, and sensitive" rifle. It had trouble with various ammo, and cycling issues. One of the suggestions was to not use normal CLP, but to focus on using Shooter's Choice FP-10. (Shooter’s Choice FP-10 Lubricant Elite CLP | Gun Cleaner, Lubricant, and Protectant (shooters-choice.com)) (REF: MR762 not cycling - jamming)

Image

The KAC MK11 Field Manual from the USN specifically references using Shooter's Choice FP-10 due to its superior abilities to lubricate the weapon system

This brought about discussions of barrel break-in. But what does it mean in today's terms to "break-in" a rifle barrel, and is it really necessary?

I personally use a lube that was developed by a race car engineer, who implemented a Molybdenum Disulfide blend for his and his daughter's rifles (Jeany's Cutting Edge All-In-One CLP 4oz – ZK Performance ). Thank you Mike Kojima for this wonderful product.

Molybdenum is normally used as an racing oil additive, like zinc, to help create a bonded coating to the high spinning race pistons, helping prolong their life, and mitigate metal-on-metal contact. These race engines could then be revved to a higher maximum RPM, and sustain more abuse than engines without this oil additive. So what is it?

Molybdenum disulfide, MoS2, the most common natural form of molybdenum, is extracted from ore and then purified for direct use in lubrication. Since molybdenum disulfide is of geothermal origin, it has the durability to withstand significant heat and pressure. This is particularly so if small amounts of sulfur are available to react with iron and provide a sulfide layer which is compatible with MoS2 in maintaining the lubricating film.

A number of unique properties distinguish molybdenum disulfide from other solid lubricants:
  • A low coefficient of friction (0.03-0.06)
  • A film forming structure with a strong affinity for metallic surfaces
  • A yield strength as high as 3450 MPa (500 x 103 psi)
  • Stability in the presence of most solvents
  • Effective lubricating properties from cryogenic temperatures to about 350oC in air (1200oC in inert or vacuum conditions).
Normal CLP uses an Ester based oil. This is a significant use for both firearms, and for racing engines; an Ester based motor oil is considered superior to most consumer oils. Molybdenum and its film forming structure takes this to another level.

Molybdenum is a uniquely thermogenic-activated lubricating compound. When subjected to significant heat against a metal surface, it molecularly bonds to that surface. Think of how "Teflon" and non-stick cooking pans work. It basically creates this ability inside a rifle barrel. Since unlined precision barrels like the MR762 offer a notable ratio of iron, and sulfur tends to be used in gun powders, we can say that the MR platform responds very well to a full Molybdenum Disulfide treatment and conditioning.

The concept of using Molybdenum is not new. In John Plaster's book, "The Ultimate Sniper" (Second Edition, page 132), the concept of Moly-Coated bullets was considered. The idea is that the coating with Molybdenum Disulfide would increase velocity and improve long-range accuracy. It was confirmed to make the bullet more slick, reducing friction as it traveled down the bore. It would also leave the barrel cleaner, and make it easier to maintain.
"Whether applied as a liquid that dries into a film coating or impact-planted using a tumbler and wax sealant, this moly coat is so thin that it doesn't change the bullet's outer dimensions..."
"While developing the M118 Long Range round, the Lake City Army Ammunition Plant included several tests using moly-coated bullets, which 'all shot better than control cartridges in 600-yard accuracy tests.' Interestingly, these loads also demonstrated a 'measurable reduction of chamber pressures.' However, by the time the distance reached 1,000 yards, the moly-coated round performed no more accurately than other loads. Had these test rounds been loaded to higher velocity—which the reduced chamber pressure could allow—they may have scored better at 1,000 yards, too."
So, this brings us back to Jeany's Gun Lube and Shooter's Choice FP-10: they're both Molybdenum Disulfide based.

Instead of coating the bullets, years later it was found to be much easier to simply wet-patch the barrel. But, it needs to be "baked in" first for it to work. This brings about a barrel break-in process, which would be better termed a barrel-conditioning process in order to best activate the moly compound into the unlined barrel surface.

Your mileage may vary, but currently, I've found the best results to be from half of the US Army's former M24 SWS barrel beak-in process, as follows:
  1. 1 round fired; wet patch (1 single patch through), bore snake, wet patch. Repeat 5 times. 5 Rounds Total.
  2. 3 rounds fired; wet patch, bore snake, wet patch. Repeat 5 times. 15 Rounds Total.
  3. 5 rounds fired; wet patch, bore snake, wet patch. Repeat 5 times. 25 Rounds Total.
  4. 20 Rounds Fired; complete a proper cleaning, wet patch and bore snake until barrel is fully lubed and cleaned.
My wet patch means putting 3-5 drops of FP-10 or Jeany's Gun Lube onto the center of the patch. It will naturally spread. Farther down the patch will be dry, and pick up excess. I do not run any dry patches.

The point of this entire process is to bake-in the molybdenum as stated above. By firing, then cleaning, in this repetition, it is slowly building up more and more heat into the barrel, and conditioning the barrel to molecularly bond the moly to it.

Another advantage is by having the barrel lubed with a molecularly bonded substance, it will minutely but notably change the barrel harmonics. The exact tuning changes need to be documented at a later date.

Sure, there's plenty of arguments and debates about the barrel itself being broken in, with any small-grain imperfections being worn down and smoothed out by the super-heated copper projectile being sent out of the tapered HK barrel. But while this has been debated for ages, if it does anything at all, it is merely an added bonus to formally conditioning the barrel with this moly treatment.

So in short, use a molybdenum based gun lube for the MR762. It can be used only on the barrel, or on the entire weapon system. It does not smell good, and it is highly viscous getting in every last pore of the rifle, and your fingers (for you military folks, do NOT eat with moly on your fingers. It will not taste nearly as good as CLP does... I know you get me.)

In a well tuned, normally operating HK MR762 -- regardless of model, era or barrel profile -- you will find significant precision and accuracy consistency by using Molybdenum in your barrels. And the best part is, the more regularly you use it, the more you'll see this reliability. It is not a magic liquid and it will not make your shooting better. But it is one more item to add to a rifle's precision, to allow for a shooter's accuracy to have an advantage.

* * *​

2. Understanding the Standard - The Heckler & Koch PSG-1
Updated 25 APR 2025

The PSG1 wasn’t just another rifle – it was a statement. Built by Heckler & Koch in direct response to the 1972 Munich massacre, it was designed for high-risk police and counter-terror operations where a single missed shot could mean civilian casualties. It’s based on the G3 platform, but calling it a modified G3 doesn’t do it justice. Nearly every part of the PSG1 was rebuilt for accuracy, consistency, and mechanical precision.

The action remains a roller-delayed blowback, but the similarities end there. The bolt carrier group is hand-fitted. Titanium locking pieces, polished internals, and a reinforced receiver all tighten the system up. It’s smooth, consistent, and overbuilt in a way that’s rare for semi-autos. Tolerances are tight. Everything is fitted like a bolt gun – but you still get follow-up shots without needing to break position.

The 25.59" barrel is a major part of what makes the PSG1 special. It’s hammer-forged from H&K’s “French Cannon Grade” ordnance steel – an alloy known for consistency under heat and pressure. It’s polygonal rifled: right-hand twist, four grooves, 1:12 rate. That twist was optimized for 168-grain match bullets, specifically Federal Gold Medal Match. Polygonal rifling helps reduce fouling, increases barrel life, and improves velocity retention. The barrel is heavy-profile and fully free-floated in a reinforced trunnion block with zero contact from the forend. There’s no front sight tower or clamp-on hardware to disrupt harmonics.

Image


Every barrel is match-lapped at the factory. Every rifle is test-fired. Not sample testing – individual rifles. Each PSG1 had to shoot a 50-round group under 3.14 inches at 300 meters. That’s a full magazine cycle under 1 MOA. If it failed, it was sent back to the armory to be reworked. Final test targets, usually 8 rounds at 300m, came included with the rifle.

The trigger is a tuned, non-adjustable two-stage unit that breaks around 3.5 lbs. It’s built into an extended polymer housing with an ergonomic grip and palm shelf. The stock is fully adjustable: cheek riser, buttpad, and length of pull are all dialable. There’s a recoil buffer system in the stock that helps regulate bolt speed and reduce felt recoil, which keeps the rifle stable over long strings of fire.

Optics were Hensoldt ZF 6×42 with a built-in BDC for 168gr .308 loads. It mounts on H&K’s claw mount system and holds zero reliably. Reticle is clean and usable, and the glass clarity was excellent for its time.

The complete rifle weighs in at 17.81 lbs with optics. It’s heavy, front-heavy, and not meant for field movement. There’s no manual bolt hold-open, and the magazines are proprietary. Disassembly takes time. This wasn’t a gun built for warfighting – it was built to sit on a rooftop or behind glass and put rounds exactly where they were needed, shot after shot.

From cold bore to round 50, these rifles held sub-MOA. That includes cold bore shift – one of the biggest differentiators between precision bolt guns and semi-autos. The PSG1 performed like a bolt gun with gas-powered follow-up shots.The rifle’s closest competitor at the time was the M24 SWS, which was bolt-action, and capable of 0.5 MOA with M118LR. But it wasn’t semi-auto. For decades, nothing in the semi-auto world could match what the PSG1 delivered.

H&K followed it up with the MSG90, the MR762, and more recently the G28 – but none of them went through the same level of tuning, fitting, and hand-testing. The PSG1 was never about modularity or economy. It was about getting the absolute most accuracy possible out of a semi-auto platform.

PSG1 vs. M24 SWS – A Straight-Up Technical Comparison

CategoryHK PSG1M24 SWS
ActionSemi-auto, roller-delayed blowbackBolt-action, Remington 700 Long Action
Caliber7.62Ă—51mm NATO7.62Ă—51mm NATO (later .300 Win Mag)
Barrel25.59", polygonal, free-floated heavy profile24", 5R cut-rifled, free-floated stainless
Twist Rate1:121:11.25
Accuracy Standard50 rounds under 3.14" at 300m0.5 MOA with M118LR
Trigger2-stage match (non-adjustable), ~3.5 lbs2-stage, fully adjustable
OpticHensoldt ZF 6Ă—42, BDC to 600mLeupold Mark 4 10Ă—42 M3
Weight (scoped)17.81 lbs~14.25 lbs
Cold Bore ShiftMinimal—sub-MOAMinimal—sub-MOA
Design PhilosophyBench-level semi-auto precisionRugged, field-grade bolt action

What this shows: The PSG1 gave you bolt-gun accuracy in a semi-auto. It was a benchrest-grade sniper rifle with none of the compromises that usually come with semi-auto platforms. The M24 was rugged, field-deployable, and forgiving. The PSG1 was exact, purpose-built, and hand-finished to a level few rifles ever reach. This is the legacy the MR762 has to live up to if it is to be a proper successor.

* * *​

3. The HK417 – A Response to the Global War on Terror
Updated 24 APR 2025 - Revised again with an expanded background and adoption history

Image


The HK417, the military predecessor of the civilian MR762, represents a significant evolutionary step in the development of modern battle rifles. Its origins lie in the heightened operational demands of the early 21st century, especially during the opening years of the Global War on Terror (GWOT). Developed alongside the HK416, the HK417 was a deliberate attempt to address the known shortcomings of legacy 5.56mm and 7.62mm systems then in service with NATO and allied forces.

The push for a more reliable and durable rifle stemmed largely from the operational deficiencies observed in the M4 carbine, especially under the extreme environmental conditions of Iraq and Afghanistan. Numerous after-action reviews highlighted failures in bolt integrity, gas system reliability, and fouling under sustained fire. The root of many of these issues traced back to the M4's direct impingement gas system and its limitations in high-round-count or suppressed environments.

Around this time, Larry Vickers – a retired Delta Force operator and one of the key figures in modern small arms testing and development – visited Heckler & Koch Oberndorf factory in Germany. Alongside representatives from U.S. Army Special Operations, Vickers collaborated with HK engineers to prototype a rifle system that used the short-stroke gas piston mechanism derived from HK’s G36 rifle. This system, adapted and scaled to AR-style rifles, became the core of what would become the HK416 in 5.56mm and the HK417 in 7.62x51mm NATO.

The HK417’s design addressed the three critical needs of modern warfighters:
  • Reliability in adverse conditions (e.g., dust, mud, suppressor use)
  • Compatibility with NATO standard magazines and optics
  • Enhanced barrel life and durability due to cold hammer-forging and chrome lining
Its introduction filled a critical role between battle rifle and sniper support weapon. Unlike the M14-based systems or early SR-25 variants, the HK417 was purpose-built from the ground up for modern optics, modular accessories, and suppressed fire. It also benefitted from lessons learned during the German Army’s G28 DMR program, which led to improvements in receiver rigidity, extended rails, free-floated barrels, and modular buttstocks with adjustability for scope height and shooter preference.

Operational Adoption
The HK417 was quickly adopted by elite units across NATO, including Germany’s KSK, the UK’s SAS, France’s COS, and Norway’s FSK. Within the U.S., it was tested and evaluated alongside systems like the Knight’s Armament SR-25/Mk11 Mod 0, and later as a DMR candidate for SOCOM under CSASS (Compact Semi-Automatic Sniper System) evaluations. Though the SR-25 lineage ultimately won that contract in its updated M110A1 H&K-built configuration, the HK417 influenced the platform significantly.

Variants of the HK417 include:
  • HK417A2 – updated with improved barrel harmonics, ambidextrous controls, and lighter handguards
  • G28 – designated marksman variant adopted by the Bundeswehr
  • MR308 / MR762 – semi-auto civilian variants with similar architecture, barrel quality, and modularity
The rifle has seen combat use in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, and multiple undisclosed operations carried out by Western special operations units. Operators favor the HK417 for its ability to bridge the gap between assault rifle and precision rifle – delivering 7.62mm power in a controllable, reliable semi-auto platform.

Legacy and Evolution
The HK417’s success lies in its engineering refinement, modular architecture, and user-driven development. Unlike traditional battle rifles of the Cold War, it was developed in collaboration with modern warfighters and is purpose-built for integration with advanced optics, suppressors, and enablers like laser aiming devices.

It is both a combat-proven system and a developmental milestone that helped shape the design language for many future semi-automatic sniper and DMR platforms. Its DNA lives on in the G28, the CSASS variant of the M110A1, and of course, the civilian MR762.

As modern conflicts continue to blur the line between urban CQB, vehicle operations, and open-field precision engagements, the HK417 remains a benchmark platform – reliable, accurate, and enduring.

* * *
4. The G28 DMR – Evolution of a Precision Rifle
Updated 25 APR 2025
Image


The G28 is the German Bundeswehr’s designated marksman rifle, derived directly from the HK417 platform and adapted to meet the specific needs of long-range engagements and urban overwatch roles. Developed by Heckler & Koch in response to an urgent operational requirement for a more precise and versatile rifle system, the G28 is functionally a militarized and refined iteration of the HK417, with several enhancements focused on accuracy, modularity, and sustained combat use.

Design Origins and Configuration
The G28 project began in the late 2000s as part of the Bundeswehr’s Infanterist der Zukunft (IdZ) program—Germany’s Future Soldier initiative. At its core, the G28 retained the short-stroke gas piston operating system and 7.62x51mm NATO chambering of the HK417, but incorporated several structural and ergonomic improvements:
  • A longer, heavy-profile free-floated barrel (16.5" or optional 20"), cold hammer forged for accuracy and durability
  • A proprietary handguard system with integrated top rail, designed to support night vision and thermal optics without shifting zero
  • Fully adjustable buttstock for cheek weld and length-of-pull
  • An integrated bipod mount, ambidextrous fire controls, and a designated Schmidt & Bender 3-20x50 PM II scope in a quick-detach mount
The G28 was adopted in two major configurations:
  • Standard G28 Patrol Configuration (Patrouillenvariante)
  • G28 E2 / Z Variant, a lighter version designed for airborne and mounted troops, later influencing the U.S. Army’s M110A1 CSASS platform
All G28s are painted in RAL8000 brown/green tones to reduce visibility in arid and transitional environments.

Combat Performance and Role
The G28 was issued to Bundeswehr troops operating in Afghanistan, where its combination of semi-automatic fire, high-precision optics, and rugged construction provided German infantry squads with enhanced overwatch capabilities. It was particularly effective in mountainous terrain, offering accurate suppression and engagement out to 800 meters with standard DM111 or DM151 ball and DM111 armor-piercing ammunition.

While heavier than a standard infantry rifle, the G28 offered a significant step-up in effective range and hit probability, making it a reliable precision platform for counter-sniper, convoy protection, and urban support missions.

Influence on International DMR Programs
The G28’s proven reliability and modularity served as the direct developmental base for the U.S. Army M110A1 CSASS and SDMR programs. Although the U.S. configuration underwent significant changes—including barrel contour, optic, and suppressor selection—the DNA of the G28 is unmistakable in both the CSASS and SDMR. The U.S. Army’s decision to work with HK for the M110A1 was directly influenced by the G28’s success in German service.

Conclusion
The G28 stands as a refined example of what a modern semi-automatic designated marksman rifle can achieve when precision, durability, and modular integration are prioritized. It filled a vital capability gap in the Bundeswehr and became the blueprint for international developments in the DMR category—cementing its place as one of the most respected 7.62mm NATO precision rifles of the 21st century.

* * *​

5. The First Generation MR762 – Teething Issues and Early User Experience
Updated 24 APR 2025
Image
Introduced to the U.S. civilian market in January 2012, the first generation HK MR762A1 offered enthusiasts a semi-automatic, commercial version of the renowned HK417. Outwardly, the MR762 shared much of its military counterpart’s DNA – most notably its 16.5-inch cold hammer-forged, heavy-profile barrel that was non-chrome lined, tapered from chamber to muzzle, and heat-pressed into the monolithic upper receiver. This configuration delivered superb rigidity, a trait essential to its intended precision role. The rifle weighed in at 9.84 lbs without optics or accessories.

Despite its impressive engineering pedigree, the earliest production models of the MR762 were not without issue. Within both enthusiast communities and technical forums, reports began to surface of inconsistent cycling behavior and sensitivity to specific ammunition types. Some rifles functioned flawlessly out of the box, while others struggled to cycle certain factory match loads – a curious inconsistency for a platform based on a military-proven design.

Early Field Observations
As one of the earliest adopters of the MR762 – a serial number below 001200 – I experienced these teething issues firsthand. My rifle demonstrated erratic cycling behavior across multiple premium .308 match loads, including:
  • Federal Gold Medal Match 175gr SMK – Reliable accuracy, but occasional failure to feed
  • Winchester M118LR 175gr – Frequent chambering failures
  • Hornady TAP ELD AR 168gr – Grouped well, but failed to cycle consistently
  • Norma Golden Target 175gr – 1.5 MOA average, but slightly erratic cycling
  • Hornady TAP ELD Precision 168gr – Less consistent groupings, poor cycling
  • Federal Berger Juggernaut 185gr – High recoil impulse, reduced precision without ideal shooter input
In short, the rifle was ammo-sensitive and displayed under-gassing characteristics that impacted its reliability. While many assumed these were simply break-in quirks or lube/ammo mismatches, further inspection revealed a deeper issue. I submitted the rifle to Heckler & Koch USA in Georgia under warranty.

Factory Diagnostics & Engineering Findings
Upon arrival, HK’s technicians initially found no mechanical defects during standard testing. However, when the rifle was evaluated by Senior Engineering Technician Jesse Teague at HK's Prototyping & Research Lab, a borescope inspection revealed the culprit: an improperly deburred gas port with an undersized opening.

The gas port, responsible for bleeding pressure from the barrel to cycle the bolt, was not machined to specification. Its sharp, unpolished edge shaved minute layers of copper from bullet jackets during firing, which slowly accumulated inside the port like metal shavings from a cheese grater. Over time, this build-up effectively choked the gas system, reducing gas flow and leading to cycling failures – especially with match-grade ammunition, which typically operates at lower pressures than military ball.
"We punched the gas port out to 1.6mm [the updated specification], deburred it properly, and installed a tighter-tolerance gas block."
— Heckler & Koch Engineering Team
The original port measured 1.53mm, and while that difference may seem negligible, it becomes significant when operating under 45,000–50,000 PSI of chamber pressure. The smallest restriction in a gas system – especially in a piston-driven rifle – can have exponential effects on reliability.

HK’s engineering team fully disassembled the barrel, corrected the port size, deburred all edges, and reassembled the system using updated tooling and gas blocks with tighter fitment. These revisions brought the first-generation rifle in line with current production tolerances.

Image

The 2012 MFD MR762 DMR being shot from Heckler & Koch's bench with impressive results from Federal GMM SMK 168gr
Lessons for Owners of Early Production Rifles
The MR762's early production history provides insight into the challenges manufacturers face when adapting military designs for commercial markets. While the HK417 platform was already combat-proven, slight variances in gas system specifications, ammunition pressures, and user expectations highlighted a gap that only field feedback and internal engineering diagnostics could resolve.

Owners of early MR762 rifles – particularly those with serial numbers from the first production batches – should be aware of these potential issues. If your rifle exhibits symptoms like inconsistent cycling, erratic ejection, or selective ammo reliability, it may be worthwhile to have the gas port inspected, measured, and possibly reworked under HK’s warranty program.

Image

The author's 2012 MFD MR762 in full DMR Configuration, fitted with a
Nill-Griffe PSG-1 Pistol Grip to mimic the former H&K SR9TC and PSG1

Post-Service Performance
After receiving the corrected rifle, function and performance improved dramatically. Testing conducted by HK's factory bench yielded a 0.341 MOA 5-shot group using Federal Gold Medal Match 168gr SMK – an exceptional result for any semi-automatic precision rifle, especially one over a decade old. The heavy, 1:11 twist barrel harmonized remarkably well with what would be considered “dated” match-grade ammunition.

Following this, I conducted further field testing with a variety of loads to confirm reliability and function. While my own shooting ability – enhanced by coffee, not caffeine discipline – introduces more variance than HK’s test bench, the system now cycles all match ammo with consistency. Reliability is no longer a concern, and precision remains firmly within sub-MOA territory.

The early MR762 may have had its share of growing pains, but those issues are fully correctable. More importantly, the platform’s design – centered on quality materials, rigid construction, and excellent harmonics – ensures that when properly tuned, even the earliest rifles are capable of world-class accuracy.

Owners of legacy rifles should not hesitate to contact HK for service. The combination of updated tooling, engineering support, and factory testing means that no MR762, regardless of production year, needs to remain underperforming.

Image

Even when having a bad day shooting, we were grouping 1 MOA. This rifle now has zero issues cycling any 168gr or 175gr 7.62 or .308.

Image


And on a better day, its clear what this rifle can do. This was shot in the prone on a clear day.

Image


Shooting under 1/2 MOA? Now that's impressive. Its able to do it. Its up to the shooter to perform though. It is vital that all marksmanship fundamentals are performed with this rifle, or it will absolutely throw a flyer.

Image


Seeing 0.7 to 0.8 MOA is consistent with what is to be expected from this rifle. It is entirely ammo dependent though.


* * *

6. Late Generation MR762 LRPIII – New Machining and Modern Reform
Updated 24 APR 2025
Image
The late-generation MR762 LRPIII represents the culmination of more than a decade of refinement since the rifle’s civilian debut. While outwardly similar to earlier variants, subtle but meaningful improvements distinguish these rifles. Modern machining techniques have resulted in tighter manufacturing tolerances, contributing to better out-of-the-box accuracy and improved parts consistency. The previously removable polymer brass deflector has been replaced with a fully integrated aluminum unit, enhancing durability and alignment.

Ergonomic modernization is also evident. All MR762 variants now ship with M-LOK compatible handguards, replacing earlier proprietary quad-rails. The LRPIII package itself features updated optics, transitioning from the original Leupold 3-9x to a Vortex Viper PST Gen II 3-15x MRAD, equipped with the EBR-7C reticle – a considerable upgrade in both magnification range and reticle precision, especially for DMR and long-range shooting applications.

Why the LRPIII Package is Worth Considering
From a cost-efficiency perspective, the LRPIII variant offers tremendous value. When compared to building a base MR762 into a similar configuration – with upgraded rail, optic, mount, case, bipod, and accessories – the price difference is often negligible. Crucially, the LRPIII is now the only way to acquire a factory-fitted 1:11 twist heavy barrel, since HK shifted production focus in 2021. For users who want the original HK precision DNA without compromise, the LRPIII is the definitive choice.

Field Performance and Testing Notes
Extensive live-fire testing with the LRPIII has demonstrated strong performance across a variety of match-grade ammunition types. Grouping results were marked and analyzed to differentiate shooter error from ammunition behavior, using color-coded frames during post-analysis. Among notable findings:
  • Winchester M118LR 175gr: Surprisingly accurate. Though cycling was intermittently inconsistent, the groups revealed the rifle’s harmonic compatibility with the round. A quick field tip: a light dry polish of each cartridge with a rag noticeably improved reliability.
  • Federal GMM 168gr & 175gr SMK: Consistent sub-MOA performers, typically in the 0.6–0.7 MOA range.
  • Hornady TAP ELD AR 168gr: Chronographed at 2486 fps, this load consistently performed well out to 1,000+ yards.
As with my first-generation MR762, I may consider sending this LRPIII unit – nicknamed "Tannie" – back to HK for barrel and gas system tuning to ensure full compatibility with lower-pressure rounds like M118LR, mirroring the successful modifications made to my earlier rifle.

Image

Long Range Field Validation
Performance claims were put to the test at the CR2 Mountain Precision Course in Palisades, Colorado, on March 16–17, 2024. During this two-day event, I confirmed the MR762 LRPIII’s capability to consistently hit man-sized steel targets at 1,000 yards using Hornady TAP ELD AR 168gr, which chronographed at 2,486 fps from the 16.5" barrel. The rifle demonstrated excellent precision and reliability under field conditions, reinforcing its suitability for long-range engagements.

Pushing the limits further, I was able to engage targets at 1,200 yards with reasonable confidence, provided accurate wind calls. The 1,100-yard mark proved to be a transitional challenge, as it represented the threshold of the bullet’s transonic window – a zone where aerodynamic instability often begins to degrade accuracy. Nevertheless, with careful observation and wind correction, consistent hits remained achievable.

Image

The author's highly modified MR762 LRPIII at Cameo Shooting Complex in Palisades, Colorado USA,
where 1200 yard engagements were sustained

These results underscore the MR762’s long-range potential when paired with properly matched ammunition and environmental awareness. I’ll continue to document future range sessions with updated footage as it becomes available.

In practical application, the LRPIII's performance parallels legacy precision semi-autos like the PSG-1 – a noteworthy benchmark given the MR762’s lighter profile and broader versatility.
  • Link To The MR762 LRPIII "Tannie" shooting Federal GMM SMK 175gr out to 625 yards hitting 10" Steel Targets effortlessly: INSTAGRAM VIDEO
  • Link to the MR762 LRPIII "Tannie" engaging 1000 yard targets at Cameo Shooting Complex in Palisades, Colorado USA: INSTAGRAM VIDEO

Closing Thoughts
The late-generation MR762 LRPIII reflects HK’s iterative refinement of one of the most capable semi-automatic 7.62mm rifles on the market. With enhanced machining, a proven heavy barrel profile, upgraded glass, and the harmonic consistency of the 1:11 twist, this rifle confidently bridges the gap between DMR and precision semi-auto roles. For shooters looking to push beyond 600 yards – and well into 1,000-yard territory – the LRPIII delivers both the platform and precision needed to meet that challenge.

Image

This is a very capable rifle, and after seeing sub 3/4th MOA groupings on par with the PSG-1, I am confident with this rifle to perform precision work. Next will be focusing on chronographing velocities, and then pushing the rounds out to distance to demonstrate real world capabilities.

* * *​

7. Medium Contour MR762 - The Weight Loss
Update 26 APR 2025
Image

For some time, I delayed writing this section, wanting to gain firsthand experience with the new medium contour MR762A1. Fortunately, I was able to gather reliable insights from reputable sources, including an in-depth review from Jeff Wood at Guns.com (source), who documented the rifle’s real-world precision potential with premium ammunition.

Mechanically, the late-generation MR762 remains nearly identical to its predecessors in core design. It retains the same cold hammer-forged barrel, monolithic upper, and 1:11 twist rate. Key changes include the adoption of a lighter, medium contour barrel -- saving over one pound of barrel mass -- and the now-standard M-LOK handguard replacing the legacy quad-rail system.

Despite the reduced barrel mass, ballistics remain remarkably consistent with the heavy barrel versions. Early precision testing validates this:

Image

(Groupings by Jeff Wood of Guns.com)
Jeff Wood’s accuracy results:
  • (Left) 175gr Berger OTM: ~0.5 MOA at 100 yards
  • (Right) Desert Tech Match 175gr: ~0.8 MOA, consistent with Federal Gold Medal Match SMK 175gr results in my own heavy barrel MR762s.
Real-world user data further supports this. HKPro member @PeterNNH shared extensive grouping data from his medium contour MR762, noting strong affinity for heavier match-grade loads:
"My MR762 with the lighter barrel seems to prefer heavier bullets. Federal GMM 175gr, Lapua Scenar 175gr, and even the Federal Berger 185gr Juggernaut all delivered sub-MOA at 600 yards. Best results were achieved with the 185gr Berger Juggernaut, keeping all ~12 shots inside the 10 and X rings on an MR-1 target."
Interestingly, PeterNNH also observed occasional undergassing symptoms -- likely a natural outcome of lighter barrel harmonics and slightly different gas system backpressure characteristics compared to the older heavy-barreled MR762. Nevertheless, across multiple loads, the rifle demonstrated reliable precision within the expectations of a designated marksman platform.

Why the Switch to a Contoured Barrel?
The shift to a lighter barrel design was primarily driven by the U.S. Army's requirements for the M110A1 SDMR program. Weight reduction became a critical factor: soldiers needed a rifle that could deliver precision at squad ranges without the burden of a traditional heavy sniper rifle. HK responded by redesigning the HK417 barrel profile into a medium contour format that preserved acceptable heat resistance while dramatically reducing weight.

Rather than maintaining two separate production lines for civilian and military models, Heckler & Koch standardized the lighter barrel profile across all MR762 production after 2020. This manufacturing consolidation simplified logistics while bringing the MR762 platform closer to modern combat and DMR standards.

Performance Outlook
In practical terms, the lighter barrel cools faster between strings of fire but will heat up more quickly during sustained engagements -- an acceptable trade-off for its intended designated marksman role. Importantly, metallurgy remains unchanged: HK’s high-molybdenum steel provides excellent resilience against throat erosion and barrel wear.

Field reports and precision testing suggest that the medium contour MR762 is fully capable of sub-MOA performance when paired with quality ammunition and solid fundamentals. While shooters seeking extreme harmonic stability for extended-range match shooting may still prefer the older heavy contour barrel, the medium profile offers significant weight savings with minimal real-world sacrifice in accuracy for its intended role.

The medium contour MR762 now forms the direct technical bridge to the M110A1 SDMR and CSASS platforms: a transition that will be explored in greater depth in the next section.

* * *​

8. The New M110A1 - The Culmination for the Everyday Marksman
(Updated 20NOV24)
Image

INTRODUCTION TO THE M110A1
I've been trying to understand the design philosophies behind the new M110A1 SDMR, including its CSASS program: why did HK switch to a Medium Contoured barrel on the new MR762, when the harmonics offered so much on the heavy 1:11 twist barrel? This led to my research into this platform.

The M110A1 CSASS Program was created to fill the gaps existing from the M110 SASS, and to push retirement of the MK14 Enhanced Battle Rifle (EBR). When the program was introduced in 2012, the KAC M110 had history of its own problems through trigger failures, while the size of the weapon system with a non-adjustable buttstock and overall length having a 20" barrel -- even longer once the suppressor was added -- was considered troublesome. With the requirement for the entire weapon system to go back to KAC for service, many were reverting back to the EBR, which had its own sets of issues and problems. Many issues have been solved on M110s today, but this wasn't the case at this time.

Furthermore, accuracy from the M110 SASS has regularly been debated. Some shoot 3/4 MOA. Others shoot 3 MOA, an issue that exists today. Other accuracy issues existed at the time of the original solicitation:

"I had a number of colleagues who attended our Special Forces Group's SOTIC course at Ft. Campbell with their new M110 rifles. More than just a few came back reporting shot out barrels after less than five hundred rounds fired. The guns were dropping up to eight Minutes of Angle (MOA) and becoming hopelessly inaccurate. Snipers and spotters ended up sharing a weapon in many Sniper teams. While I did not have this experience with the M110's on my team, I had too many Green Berets report this experience to me personally to discount it or chalk it all up to hype. The Army often keeps these types of failures in-house, worried that bad publicity will result in the Army getting something even worse down the line rather than simply correcting the flaws in the system. I've been told by soldiers recently rotated out of theater that the new generation of M110's do not have this issue so it seems this flaw has since been corrected." (REF: Military.com , thefirearmblog.com)

At the time of contract solicitation -- and the early years of the Global War on Terror -- longer range effective engagements beyond the capabilities of the standard issue M4 and M16 were indeed needed due to the distances being encountered in Afghanistan, but with the M110 SASS, maneuverability was being sacrificed, accuracy was questioned, and the need for reliability was paramount. Furthermore, rapid engagement was vital, negating looking at a bolt-action system. From this, the CSASS was brought into consideration.

Image

One of the early prototypes of the M110A1 CSASS

The contract had the following requirements:
  1. Operation: Semi-automatic
  2. Caliber: Compatible with 7.62x51mm NATO cartridges
  3. Accuracy: Capable of 0.60" Average Mean Radius at 100m or better with match ammunition. (1.05 +/- MOA)
  4. Size: Overall length shall be reduced using a shorter barrel and/or collapsible buttstock. Maximum overall assembled length of the rifle shall be not greater than 36 inches with the stock at its shortest position and no sound suppressor mounted.
  5. Weight: Weight shall be no more than 9.0 lb for the unloaded rifle without optics and accessories
  6. Grip: A modular, adjustable pistol grip.
  7. Trigger: A non-adjustable match style trigger.
  8. Hand guard: A fore-end that includes a fixed 12 o' clock rail with configurable 3, 6, and 9 o' clock rails.
  9. Sound suppressor: A muzzle mounted, detachable sound suppressor.
  10. Muzzle device: A compensator/muzzle break compatible with the sound suppressor.
  11. Bipod: Tool-less detachment featuring cant and pan/track capability.
  12. Day optic: An Army specified variable power day optic and compatible rings.
  13. Back up sights: Iron sights offset 45 deg from the DOS.
  14. Sling attachment: Flush cup, quick detach sling attachment points.
  15. Barrel and Receiver Life: Significant improvement from M110 requirements while enduring higher rates of fire.
In addition to the above listed enhancements, the CSASS had to meet the operational and environmental requirements that were fulfilled by the original M110 SASS.

Firms/companies were invited to provide information and relative background on their capabilities to provide spare parts and contractor logistical support for depot level maintenance of the entire upgraded weapon system. The production requirement for CSASS has estimated range of 125 per month with a capability to ramp up to 325 per month.

Image

The M110A1 CSASS being tested on the range during trials,
featuring its short buttstock and Schmidt & Bender PMII Scope

On April 6, 2016 Heckler & Koch Defense Inc. was awarded a contract worth up to $44.5 million from the U.S. Army for a new compact sniper rifle. The Compact Semi-Automatic Sniper System (CSASS) aims to provide the service with a small, lightweight, highly accurate weapon, addressing a critical need to replace older and heavier rifles currently in use.

Under terms of the award, HK Defense would produce up to 3,643 rifles. Bids were solicited via the Internet with eight received with an estimated completion date of March 30, 2022. Funding and work location would be determined with each order. Army Contracting Command, Picatinny Arsenal, New Jersey, is the contracting activity (W15QKN-16-D-0051).

The new HK rifle is a lightweight variant of the 7.62 mm G28 in use by the German Army, and takes elements from both the G28 and the civilian MR308/MR762, including direct use of the MR762 Bolt Carrier Group. The HK CSASS capitalizes on the proven G28 design, meeting the Army’s requirements for accuracy, reliability, and size. Heckler & Koch would also provide spare parts, support, and training to the Army.

Image

H&K M110A1 CSASS Prototype vs KAC M110 SASS
Photo Courtesy of Vintage Rifles Shooters Club


Although the 2016 contract called for the M110A1 CSASS, none were fielded as of late 2022 -- funding and prioritization shifted instead to the SDMR variant. The SDMR configuration, based on the HK417 platform and equipped with SIG TANGO6 optics and suppressor, began limited delivery in April 2020 as part of an order up to 6,000 units. As of March 2022, final SDMR deliveries were slated to complete by late 2023 across infantry, engineer, and scout squads.

* * *
MECHANICAL DIFFERENCES
I was privy enough to see the disassembled differences between the G28/MR and the SDMR. And the differences were surprising with changes to the barrel, barrel nut, gas block, firing chamber, and gas port.

Image

Barrel:
For starters, it turns out the Army themselves went with a medium contoured barrel. We've asked, "Why the changes to the MR762, and why the anorexic barrel?" Simply put, they're making the MR barrels on the same assembly line as the SDMR barrels, just with a different twist rate, for efficiency of manufacturing. As confirmed by a senior engineering tech at H&K, they focused on putting the MR762 on a diet as much as possible to meet the Army's requirements for the M110A1, including the barrel nut.

Image

The Medium Contour SDMR barrel, versus a 2012 first generation MR762 with Heavy Contour Barrel. Note the different gas block and machined barrel nut.

The new M110A1 SDMR is a 16.3" Medium Contour Barrel in 1:8 twist that fires M118LR exclusively for a full 2-rotation of the projectile, with a base muzzle velocity of 2379ft/s. It uses its own gas block and a modified barrel nut, compared to the commercial MR762.

Both barrels are RH Twist 4 Land Groove, and both use the same materials for barrel construction, HK's French Cannon Grade Steel made by Aubert & Duval (see Part 1 Section 5 for details). The barrel of the M110A1 is manufactured entirely in Germany, with no parts of it made in the United States. And, the barrel is chrome lined, confirmed by personnel at HK. The chrome lining helps with resilience from adverse weather and the elements, at the sacrifice of some overall precision. The M110A1 barrel would not be considered a match-grade precision barrel based on this, but was mandated by the government contract.

Image


Barrel Nut:
The barrel nut is essentially the same as an MR762, except with weight cut in the form of perforations or "speed holes" all along it. Ounces equal pounds to the warfighter, and contract requirements insisted the MR762 be put on a significant weight loss program.
Image

Gassing & Gas Block:
The gas block is from the HK417 A4, originally designed to be adjustable. Through the trial program, it was found that having an adjustable gas block was not needed, and the adjustability feature was removed; It would have been considered a possible point of failure over time in the field for the Designated Marksman of an Infantry unit, with both ballistics & reliability needs deeming it unnecessary since the rifle would only be using M118LR, and almost entirely suppressed via a HUXWRX flow-through suppressor.

There are confirmed differences in gassing from the MR762 to the M110A1. Gassing should be similar to the G28. Exact differences have not been disclosed, nor the exact size of the gas port for the M110A1. The consensus is that this weapon system is currently "Undergassed" by B4s who have tested and used both the CSASS and SDMR.

Due to both contract requirements and weight requirements, it was decided to keep the original mold of the gas block as to not require resubmission, but build around it into what is now simply a very beefy unit compared to the MR762. The gas block is clearly beefier than the MR, and only has one single roll pin.

Leave it to German Engineering to simply over engineer something.

Image

MR762 Heavy vs Contoured Barrel

Barrel Weight & Contour:
The old heavy barrel from previous MR762s was 2lbs 6.2oz. The new contoured barrel shown from a 2021+ MFD MR is now 1lbs 14.5oz, as shared by (ctyatty) who took some awesome photos of barrel profile details.

It can be assumed that the barrel profile exterior above is identical on the M110A1. The weight loss makes a difference to the warfighter who has to carry it, and, for faster dissipation of heat soak during normal Marksman firing, which we touch on in a later section of Part 1.

All barrels prior to 2021 were 15x1 for the flash hider thread pitch. They have now all moved to 5/8x24, regardless of the type or contour. My 2012 HB was 15x1, while my 2022 HB was 5/8x24, for instance. I should mention that all U.S. produced barrels are 5/8Ă—24 as of this writing, while German produced barrels are still Metric 15Ă—1.

Fluted Firing Chamber:
The firing chamber is fluted to help with adverse extraction in the M110A1. This is a massive difference compared to the G28 and any MR762 or MR308. More details and photos are required, and I am working on acquiring these with details as of 6 AUG 2023. I was able to confirm these details from James at @Teufelshund Tactical and have only seen fired brass differences from this firing chamber.


As noted by @M995 the fluted firing chamber was mentioned by Jim Schatz (@G3Kurz), stating, "... the extraction cycle is more violent than a DI AR-10." And, it ensures that the suppressed rifle will extract properly when firing softer commercial grade match ammo, or when the gun is fouled or running hot. (REF: H&k g28e csass (hkpro.com)

2-Stage Precision Trigger
(Researched by @Shoegum )
The M110A1 uses a precision trigger developed by Geissele based on their Government SSA-X trigger. The prototype CSASS used HK's original trigger, but it was decided to switch to one more familiar to shooters of the M110 SASS.

Image

The trigger is similar to the HK-417 Trigger sold by Geissele, but with some minor differences, as noted by @N55 who was kind enough to share these photos:

Image

There are slight milling differences in the CSASS Trigger versus the MR762 trigger. Further, the hammer itself is notably wider, and is coated in Geissele's proprietary "nanoweapon" coating. There are small marking differences, such as where the number is milled out and lightened, instead of imprinted.

Trigger weight differences are extremely similar as well:

HK-417 CSASS Specs #05-487
Type:2 Stage
1st Stage Weight:1.9 - 2.9 lbs.
2nd Stage Weight:1.1 - 2.1 lbs.
Total Pull Weight:3.5 - 4.5 lbs.
Adjustable:No
Pin Size:Mil-Spec
HK-417 Standard Specs #05-219
Type:2 Stage
1st Stage Weight:2.75 - 3.0 lbs.
2nd Stage Weight:1.5 - 1.75 lbs.
Total Pull Weight:4.25 - 4.75 lbs.
Adjustable:No
Pin Size:Mil-Spec

New Barrel Twist Rate: 1:8
The German Military selected the 1:11 heavy barrel for the G28 DMR to push German military DM111A1/AB22 (FMJ) 147gr round to 1.5MOA. That was the standard required by the Bundeswehr. With match ammunition, the G28/MR762 is a sub-MOA rifle, plain and simple.

The M110A1 deviated from this, from the CSASS original 1:11 twist to the SDMR using 1:8. So why 1:8 for the M110A1 versus the established and proven G28 or CSASS configuration?
  • They wanted two complete rotations of the projectile from the 16" barrel, just like the M40 had 1:12 for a 24" barrel, which has demonstrated superior ballistic potential harmonically.
  • The industry is moving to 1:8 twist for .308 and 7.62 precision rounds. Some of the ballistic data was learned from SOCOM's MRGG-S program, along with advances in gas gun technology pushed by LaRue, Geissele, FN, LMT, and others.
  • They want to maximize bullet stability from the M118LR 175gr at any altitude and in harsh or cold conditions where air density is at its worst to give the best precision possible, at the sacrifice of maximum range.
  • Since the M110A1 SDMR will only be using M118LR or lighter as used in military service, they basically aimed to push M118LR to a superior and modern spin rate.
1.05 to 1.10 MOA was the contract requirement for the M110A1 (REF: CSASS Contract Requirement). This is a tighter requirement than the G28 DMR from the Bundeswehr. Observed precision shows to be in the 1-2MOA range out to 800 meters, but design specifications required it maintain its precision and accuracy only to 600 meters.

The SDMR was not designed to be a dedicated sniper system, but as a robust Designated Marksman Rifle. So its performance is only expected out to a certain range. With this, they sacrificed some overall precision (chrome lining, barrel length, twist rate), for instead offering precision up to that range. It is a calculated balancing act to offer the warfighter 1.1 MOA guaranteed accuracy from 0 to 600 meters.

They sacrificed a percentage of precision, for greater overall accuracy and ease of use. Interesting, huh?

Conversely, the maximum range of the M110A1 remains unknown. To date, only M118LR (AA11) rounds have been discharged from this weapon system. For comparison, the MR762 with 1:11 twist barrel shoots M118LR between 0.75 MOA and 1.5 MOA, depending on the batch of ammo and shooter's condition. However, since no other round types have been tested with the M110A1, the weapon system's maximum effective range with a modern round -- including attempts to fire such rounds such as the Federal Berger 185gr Juggernaut -- beyond 1000 yards at sea level, is still to be determined.

Assessment of the M110A1 CSASS and SDMR
– Precision and Operational Feedback

Updated 24 APR 2025

This section has taken time to develop, in part due to the sensitive and sometimes conflicting feedback I’ve received directly from current and former U.S. Army snipers – including National Guard B4-qualified snipers, instructors from the National Guard Sniper School, and active-duty infantry personnel. Out of respect for their anonymity and security, none will be named here.

CSASS vs. SDMR: Key Differences
While often conflated, the M110A1 CSASS (Compact Semi-Automatic Sniper System) and the M110A1 SDMR (Squad Designated Marksman Rifle) are not identical weapon systems. According to multiple verified sources, the CSASS prototype tested in the early 2020s was equipped with a heavy barrel, likely a 1:11 twist, and consistently achieved bullet velocities around 2,438 fps using standard M118LR 175gr ammunition. This contrasted sharply with fielded SDMR variants, which report average velocities around 2,379 fps, and much lower than the legacy KAC M110 SASS’s 2,604 fps from a 20-inch 5R barrel.

Precision results reinforce these differences. The CSASS prototypes reportedly delivered consistent sub-MOA performance, aligning closely with what I’ve observed in both first- and late-generation MR762 rifles. However, the fielded SDMR models show high variability in accuracy, with many units struggling to maintain 2 MOA groups – even with standard military ammunition.

Operational Feedback From B4 Snipers
Multiple Army snipers with B4 designation have reported significant concerns during field use and sniper competitions. While some SDMRs perform acceptably, others have demonstrated troubling inconsistency. During the Winston P. Wilson Sniper Competition, one experienced competitor reportedly said:
"An M110 SASS with a burnt-out barrel shot better than this piece of ***. It was brand new, out of the box. I couldn’t get it to group."
These complaints are not isolated. Repeated field feedback from vetted B4s includes:
  • Accuracy degradation over time, with performance ranging from 1 to 3 MOA depending on round count
  • Extractor breakage reports (currently unverified)
  • Failures to feed or chamber new rounds
  • Suppressor-induced overgassing and inconsistent bolt carrier velocity
  • Poor optic choice and limited magnification from the issued SIG LPVO
Image

HK M110A1 CSASS as issued and configured by the
US Air Force at the 2024 International Sniper Competition

Despite anecdotal reports of extractor failures, neither I nor HK’s service team have ever seen photographic evidence of a broken extractor or bolt carrier group. If any user has documented proof of such failures, it would be valuable to share them for verification.

Verified Shot Group Data: Fielded M110A1 SDMR
Below is a real-world dataset provided by a B4 sniper out of Fort Carson, Colorado using a fielded M110A1 SDMR equipped with a Schmidt & Bender PMII 5-25, a scope pulled from a retired MK13 system. The goal was to replicate the CSASS configuration using better glass.

Image

Shot groupswith Lake City M118LR (AA11) 175gr ammunition
(1.208, 1.044, 1.269, 0.950, 1.094, 1.468, 2.051 MOA from L to R, Top to Bottom)

These results are consistent with reported expectations: the SDMR can engage effectively out to 800 meters, especially on man-sized targets. While it cannot match the bolt-action precision of platforms like the MK13 or Barrett MK22, its accuracy is functionally equivalent to that of a well-maintained M110 SASS, particularly when using enhanced optics.

Final Analysis
The fielded M110A1 SDMR has seen growing pains. Much of the original CSASS’s performance potential was compromised by Big Army’s insistence on reducing weight, modifying the barrel, and replacing the intended optic with a lower-magnification LPVO. Many B4-qualified snipers believe the rifle is underwhelming in both accuracy and reliability compared to its original design.

However, it remains an effective platform when used within its limitations. Accuracy can be improved through the use of better optics, ammunition lot selection, and sustained maintenance. So far, no verified evidence supports claims of catastrophic mechanical failure in extractors or bolt carriers – though anecdotal experiences vary.

Ultimately, the SDMR is a compromise. It is not a replacement for a bolt-action sniper rifle, nor was it ever intended to be. It fills a squad-level precision gap, but with limited capability beyond 800 meters. For precision shooters seeking bolt-gun levels of consistency in a semi-auto package, the original CSASS configuration – with its heavier barrel and high-end optic – remains the preferred benchmark.

As of this writing (19 NOV 2024), I continue to compile performance data and user feedback from B4-qualified snipers for a broader analysis. A comprehensive field report is pending.

* * *

9. The MR762 A4 - The New Kid on the Block
Updated 20NOV24 - To Be Written, research pending


Image

* * *

Conclusion and Final Assessment
After examining multiple generations of the MR762 platform, the HK417 lineage, and the U.S. Army’s M110A1 SDMR program, several key conclusions can be drawn:
  • The M110A1 SDMR was optimized to reliably cycle M118LR 175gr ammunition under diverse conditions, prioritizing battlefield utility and weight reduction over extreme precision. Although it was required to maintain a contract-specified precision of 1.05 MOA, real-world results from the field remain mixed, with some rifles struggling to maintain sub-2 MOA performance.
  • The first-generation MR762 with a 1:11 twist heavy barrel demonstrates consistent 0.6 to 1.0 MOA accuracy when paired with proper fundamentals, barrel maintenance, and quality match-grade ammunition.
  • The most universally accurate commercial load remains Federal Gold Medal Match in both 168gr and 175gr Sierra MatchKing variants. For shooters prioritizing long-range engagement, the 185gr Federal Berger Juggernaut OTM Tactical offers superior downrange stability and wind resistance.
  • Among fielded military rounds, M118LR 175gr can still perform well—but reliability improves notably when cartridges are cleaned or lightly polished prior to use, especially in tighter-tolerance gas systems.
  • For law enforcement or mid-range urban engagements, Hornady TAP ELD AR 168gr continues to be a top-tier performer in terms of precision and terminal effect.
  • The post-2021 MR762 models, now confirmed to retain the same 1:11 twist in a medium contour barrel, require additional range data and long-term user testing. While they benefit from improved machining and tighter gas systems, real-world harmonic stability and sustained-fire characteristics are still under evaluation.
This paper has aimed to present an honest, data-informed assessment of the MR762 and its military derivatives based on firsthand testing, factory diagnostics, and sniper-end user feedback. The weapon’s design has evolved meaningfully over the past decade, and each iteration reflects changing tactical demands and manufacturing efficiencies.

Invitation to the Community
To build on this research, I invite fellow MR762 owners and service members using the M110A1 SDMR to share their 10-round 100-yard groupings for collective analysis. When submitting, please include:
  1. Barrel profile and twist rate
  2. Ammunition type and grain weight
  3. Shooting conditions (temperature, altitude, and range specifics)
This effort helps us establish a clearer performance baseline across barrel generations and shooting configurations—and contributes to a broader understanding of what these platforms are truly capable of in the hands of trained marksmen.

References:

1. Practices of Science: Precision vs. Accuracy | manoa.hawaii.edu/ExploringOurFluidEarth

2. New M110A1 and M110 | Gunboards Forums
 
#4 · (Edited)
Image

Great thread this is the older model mr762a1 with all g28 parts , this trip was to zero in my scope that was way off and have some fun , you can see the groups getting tighter as I was adjusting , this was 100 yds on a windy day with low end Winchester. I have a lot of match ammo I will take next time out and focus on tight groups and the results will be much much better.
 
#19 · (Edited)
My MR762 with the anorexic barrel seems to like heavy ammo some (non-exhaustive) match grade ammo tested:
Lapua 175gr ScenarL (600yd good grouping)
Federal GM 175gr (same as above)
Federal GM 168gr (same as above)
SigSauer 175gr (only at 100yd good groups <1MOA)
ADI 168gr (only at 100yd good groups <1MOA)
Hornady 168gr TAP - grouped very well (100&600yd) but had problems with feeding and bolt locking on an empty mag
Hornady 178gr was all over the place - I was very surprised by that
Nosler RDF 175gr was all over the place - surprised me also

Best ammo performer so far has been the Federal GM 185gr Berger Juggernaut tested only at 600yd but shots (~12) were in the 10 and X rings (MR-1 target, made me feel like I can shoot, LOL) my MR762 was humming with this ammo.

Maybe due to the heavier bullet bias its possible my gas system may be slightly under gassed, needs more testing, too cold now. All in all thus far the Anorexic barreled MR762 is IMO an excellent rifle for my needs.
@PeterNNH would you be willing to share your experience with the new MR762? You previously posted about it with various rounds tried, and I'd love to hear what you think after more than a year of ownership.
 
#20 ·
OP, thanks for the write up. If I may humbly offer some input, I think there is more than just twist rate to blame for the less than impressive precision of the SDMR. There are a lot of variables involved, and there is such a thing as too fast, but 1:8” isn’t at that limit for 7.62. I’ve seen VERY accurate 308 gas guns with 1:8” twist that were adopted in numbers far greater than I could ever afford. The Larue 7.62 guns are some of the best examples. Larue actually makes all their 7.62 guns with 1:8" barrels. Certain guns, with certain barrels, and certain ammo, just won’t produce tiny groups like folks would want. We know HK is capable of producing very accurate guns. If the Army contract spec'd 2 MOA, and HK met that requirement, there's really no reason to keep trying to squeeze extra precision out of the gun. Some of the most accurate 308 bolt guns I’ve ever shot also had 1:8” twist. Just some food for thought.


Tspeis
 
#21 ·
We know HK is capable of producing very accurate guns. If the Army contract spec'd 2 MOA, and HK met that requirement, there's really no reason to keep trying to squeeze extra precision out of the gun. Some of the most accurate 308 bolt guns I’ve ever shot also had 1:8” twist. Just some food for thought.
100% Agree. The SDMR was designed to run sub 2MOA in all weather conditions. Being able to have the same ballistic character whether at sea leavel or a mile high, in cold or in heat, was the mission set for the rifle. Tighter shot groups were sacrificed in order to meet this need, as the users of this rifle would not be running DOPE or thinking about ballistics. It is the reason for pushing the round to 1:8 twist to spin the round as hard as possible to ensure stability of a 175gr round.

I would however like to see what the M110A1 can do with a Federal SMK 175gr, a Hornady TAP ELD Precision 175gr, and a Federal Berger Juggernaut 185gr at that twist rate. So while we can speculate, the proof is in the pudding, as they say. We need to see shot groups, and also, what the rifle can do beyond 600 meters, if not beyond 800 meters, with these rounds, and at different altitudes.
 
#24 ·
An update which I eventually need to put into this thread regarding first generation MR762s versus modern MR762s:

I sent my sub 001200 serial number 2012 MFD MR762 to HK in Georgia for warranty work. That it wouldn't cycle Hornady TAP ELD AR, Federal GMM and M118LR effectively and reliably, was of significant concern.

Their initial techs couldn't find anything wrong. The rifle then went on to Jesse Teague who some may know is H&K's Senior Engineering Technician at their Prototyping & Research Lab. He too couldn't find anything wrong, until the bore scope was brought out.

This might explain the issues that many first generation MR owners have: the barrel gas port was not properly deburred from the factory. As each round is sent through the barrel, the sharp edges of the gas port shears each round, building up a copper jacket inside the gas port itself. As it builds up, less and less gas is able to be sent through the port, effectively under gassing the entire weapon system.

The rifle barrel is being removed, stripped, machined, deburred, rebuilt and reassembled to current manufacturing specifications. I've asked them to overgas the rifle to ensure I can shoot the softest match grade rounds on the market, effectively Hornady TAP ELD AR 168gr for my best use case, short of having the rifle so over gassed that it risks damaging the rifle if I run a HUXWRX can.

Once I have more details, and the rifle is in my possession, I'll do shot groups again, compared to my 2022 MR762 LRP.

I also want to get my hands on a modern 2021+ MR762 base with 1:12 contoured barrel to 1) compare weight and ballistics and 2) actually run a bore rod through to measure EXACTLY what the barrel rotation is, for the folks at HK Georgia didn't even know that the twist rate was changed.

If anyone has a medium contour barrel and can run a bore rod to measure exactly what the twist rate is -- not just what we are hearing on paper -- it would be a huge help.
 
#25 · (Edited)
This might explain the issues that many first generation MR owners have: the barrel gas port was not properly deburred from the factory. As each round is sent through the barrel, the sharp edges of the gas port shears each round, building up a copper jacket inside the gas port itself. As it builds up, less and less gas is able to be sent through the port, effectively under gassing the entire weapon system.
Yeah...you clearly don't understand that all the gas siphoned to run the piston or DI system goes through the port AFTER the bullet passes the port and the dynamics of gas flow and pressure.

And I'm not sure you quite comprehend that even nasty port jobs like this chrome-lined CHF barrel get knocked down in very short order:
Image


Likely as not, your port looks more like this:
Image


I also had a good laugh at your insistence on how you want the port "tuned" for your "soft" 168gr TAP.
 
#27 ·
Interesting. Just got an email from Jesse Teague at H&K. He said the following:

"Just an update, went ahead and punched the gas port out to 1.6mm as that is the current spec., correctly deburred the port and installed a tighter fitting gas block. Yours fit just fine but we’ve found the tighter the better. It’s going to go out for accuracy testing from our fixture either tomorrow or Wednesday. Barring any disasters, should have it back on its way to you by Thursday."

So, now this confirms that 1) previous generation MRs had a smaller spec gas port like originally concluded and 2) they also had the burring issue. Double trouble. That the gas block is different spec (tighter tolerances) on modern versus old, is also interesting.

Sharing this here so it can be added to the original document once everything is concluded. I'll start updating things shortly.

I also need shot groups from a 2021+ MFD 1:12 MR, to provide better analysis, so that my own 1:11 shot groups aren't the only thing being shown.
 
#30 ·
I also need shot groups from a 2021+ MFD 1:12 MR, to provide better analysis, so that my own 1:11 shot groups aren't the only thing being shown.
I am not sure where your located, but I have a MR762 built March/2023 that is 1:12. The quality of the build and accuracy of these rifles is fascinating to me, I have easily shot 1" groups with Bosnian Igman 147gr 308 from a bipod. I am sure its sub MOA with better ammo.
 
#29 ·
I got some feedback. Standard spec gas port is 1.60mm for the MR762. The size of the gas port after the copper jacket was removed on my personal 2012 MR was 1.53mm. Jesse sent me the following:

"I went back through my technical archives to double check some information, the spec. for the gas ports has always been 1.6mm, yours was at 1.53mm which tells me it was one of the last if not THE last on that particular tool's run."

So, mystery finally debunked on why early MRs were sometimes ammo sensitive. 0.07mm and a slight burr in the gas block made all the difference. I need to hunt down the other old posts regarding this again, and add this info to them, for those in the future having issues.
 
#34 ·
Okay. I've done one last edit. I'm pooped. If anyone sees any mistakes, whether they are grammatical, contextual or factual, please comment so I can edit and fix things. This is an important thread for anyone who dives into precision shooting with the MR762, and I need to not have any pride in it to ensure it maintains its facts.

Admins, can we consider pinning this to the main 417 category? @HKPRO?
 
#38 ·
Amazing content thank you for doing all of this- I just got the MR762 Lrp3. Not interested in the Vortex scope/mount so I am taking that off, giving to a friend and going to use a spare ATACR 1-8 with Spuhr mount. I ordered a 1000 rounds of Federal premium 175 HPBT SMK. Even If the rifle doesn’t like it I needed to stock up for my Armalite Super SASS. I may order some of the rounds you mentioned.

When I can get to the range for a few full days I am going try to compare my LRP3, SCAR 20s in 6.5cm and the Armalite. See whats what.
 
#39 ·
Heard from H&K. They sent these target shots from their testing bench, using different ammo at 100 yards with my 2012 MR762 DMR after repairs were completed.

Seeing 1/2 MOA is impressive. Seeing 0.341 MOA from a 3-shot group is astounding, especially from Federal 168gr SMK GMM that has a lower ballistic coefficient than most modern precision ammo on the market today.

Image