HKPRO Forums banner

HK MR223A3 SBR available AU

1 reading
52K views 597 replies 82 participants last post by  TallPine  
#1 · (Edited)
HK MR223A3

more that 50 of each tan and black IF inventory is live ETA - says ships by 6/10 so might not be “in stock”. I know they haven’t charged me in the past until an item ships but BBW.

Image
 
#7 · (Edited)
I’m not seeing mention of 922r compliance, am I blind?

And I’m sure they are not shipping with butt stock. They state, “length adjustable 6 position receiver extension for installation of brace or stock (ALL NFA rules apply).”

While I feel everyone’s pain about them, I’m not seeing anything saying they are selling in rifle configuration and that it is a rifle in 922r compliance.

But definitely more AU voodoo hocus pocus showing them as rifles. Jedi mind tricks if you will.

UPDATE:

BOY can I miss the tree for the forest, they are calling them rifles in the advert. :facepalm::hide:

Was in a 9 hour straight meeting today…
 
#5 ·
By the way, those honest reviews from 2021 for this product are funny...

And - like @Sirrisdesign already mentioned and also according to my current understanding of US import law and knowing how these guns are produced by HK - this is either a misrepresentation or illegal, or both:

Entirely made of German parts unlike the US made and assembled MR556, the MR223A3 is the real deal!
So buyer beware.

And no, "AU surely knows what they are doing" isn't an argument. They've proven before that they don't.
 
#14 ·
did they make fake lowers - It seems plausible.
Then it would be another "misreprensentation". Accidentally, of course.

Pretty sweet that they imported these as rifles.
Then it would be illegal if importation laws haven't changed.

And the new bossman is pretty keen on facilitating foreign imports from what I've heard, so not so sure if ATF will be directed to make that easier... :sneaky:
 
#15 ·
The only way they could do this would be to have US made lowers - cannot import SBRs due to 1968 GCA. I remember at one time AU had a bunch of RAL uppers in stock that then disappeared, so I suspect they went away to possibly build these.

Also remember when there were a bunch of RAL lower parts kits ordered and then some of us got shipped black ones instead after getting a call from AU customer service?
 
#17 ·
Could they have imported rifles and then SBR'd them as a manufacturer and put them with the 11" & 14.5" uppers?

I thought the MR223 receiver couldn't be imported but I am not in the know. I know AU has definitely "manufactured" colt SBR models.
 
#23 ·
Those have been on there, for a bit of time. I suppose the 16" version maaaayyy be possible.
 
Save
#25 ·
I don’t know how or if it’s going to result in actual sales or someone screwed up and put them on the website instead of their LEO site. I just signed up for notice like several years ago and was surprised to get the email.

but if it was somehow legit, I wanted to share the info.
 
#40 ·
Those MR223's were imported, acquired and disposed of as pistols.
Unfortunately they weren't made as pistols and HK confirmed this when asked by the ATF.

That's the misrepresentation part on side of the importer.

I don't think there are too many concerned owners out there at this point.
Well, some may not grasp the legalities, some may not care and be happy to have what they desire.
There still is a chance of some whining at some point, only question is how slim that chance is.

That it wasn't legal to import them the way they did is proven by the fact that they stopped to do it.

Now we have this new miracle to admire...
 
#42 ·
Unfortunately they weren't made as pistols and HK confirmed this when asked by the ATF.

That's the misrepresentation part on side of the importer.



Well, some may not grasp the legalities, some may not care and be happy to have what they desire.
There still is a chance of some whining at some point, only question is how slim that chance is.

That it wasn't legal to import them the way they did is proven by the fact that they stopped to do it.

Now we have this new miracle to admire...
Honestly it really depends… if the ATF OK’d this recent import, it’s good until they change their mind and stop allowing them like last time. The only time ATF is going to collect or confiscate guns is if they determine them to be “machine-guns” through whatever logical leaps they prefer.

This wouldn’t be the first time the ATF has used inconsistent reasoning or granted loopholes. Back when they did the “pistol brace amnesty” they allowed people to not only skip the $200 tax, but exempted marking and 922r requirements. In addition there are a number of other grey market pistol imports from Europe that were originally rifles.

We won’t know the truth behind this recent MR223 import unless someone does something like a FOIA request on the form 6.
 
#45 ·
That’s how you summon the bogey @thedoorman right?
:popcorn:

Although he is still lurking (last seen 56 minutes ago), his last post is from early February.

I guess he had to blow his cover as this "unaffiliated customer" he claimed to be for another AU thing.

But I am almost sure at some point in time the puppeteer behind that sock puppet will surface with another account.
 
#46 ·
This wouldn’t be the first time the ATF has used inconsistent reasoning or granted loopholes.
This isn't about "inconsistent reasoning" or "granted loopholes", this is about plain and simple but blatant lies on the import forms.

The reasoning of "once a rifle, always a rifle" still remains the same.

Back when
...was a completely different topic.

In addition there are a number of other grey market pistol imports from Europe that were originally rifles.
That doesn't make it more legal.


But hey, you do you.

All will work out. It's all legal and nobody will notice or take action.
Pretty sure that's what Larry thought, too.
 
#49 ·
This isn't about "inconsistent reasoning" or "granted loopholes", this is about plain and simple but blatant lies on the import forms.

The reasoning of "once a rifle, always a rifle" still remains the same.



...was a completely different topic.



That doesn't make it more legal.


But hey, you do you.

All will work out. It's all legal and nobody will notice or take action.
Pretty sure that's what Larry thought, too.
I get that AU isn't popular here and they actually had less than stellar service on two of the occasions I've dealt with them.

I'm just saying, until we see the actual F6's and all related communications, we don't know how they got in, or what the deal is. Do we even know who the actual importer is?

B&T USA? HKI? Or some other no-name importer.
 
You have insufficient privileges to reply here.