HKPRO Forums banner

M320-A5 Launcher at AU

1 reading
21K views 129 replies 31 participants last post by  pyrobob  
#1 ·
Why does all this stuff need to drop right before the holidays when I’m broke??

 
#112 ·
HK USA has confirmed that these are not HK products. Are not licensed HK products. Do not have anything to do with HK. None of these products should/can be sold with HK markings.
 
#113 ·
None of these products should/can be sold with HK markings.
And shouldn't be sold being marked and marketed with HK nomenclature.

It's not a M320-A5, there is no M320-A5, it's simply and truthfully a (cheap-ass turkish) KGL38.

Still nothing of that is mentioned in the GB ad, though.

Judging from what turkish shotguns cost compared to "Mossberg" branded turkish shotguns compared to US made shotguns I would be surprised if those KGL38 cost too far into the four digit space, if at all. So there is still a lot of cream and motivation in those 344.400$ :confused2:
 
#43 ·
The whole "Kale Kalip" catalogue is a pretty impressive lineup of stolen copied borrowed (purchased?) intellectual property.

I wonder how much is actually licensed (they seem to have a license for the AX50 for example, the AR/HK417 derivate that surfaced a couple of years ago likely isn't).

Kind of a "Who is Waldo" search game for grownups. :popcorn:
 
#45 ·
#64 ·
Lol …all you need to know sir is that “I am your best friend or your absolute worst enemy” 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Join_NRA
Save
#56 ·
Same here. The only controversy in my recollection
As a non-American I do not have any dealings with AU one way or the other.

But selling short barrelled rifles as unrestricted pistols by misrepresenting them as pistols during the import process although they were fully aware that these have been manufactured as rifles seems a bit controversial to me. That bit them at a later date and now current owner are in limbo about the ATFs handling of this issue. As of now, they only approached dealers. But that doesn't mean that this won't change at any point in time.


You mention something about Colt lowers, somebody mentioned "SD Gate", then the MR223 import, now this misrepresentation of a tukish knockoff launcher as a genuine HK product. So I'd say from an observers standpoint that there isn't "only" a few issues here.

And then some users post such remarks:

all times the forum crybabies said it was not possible
...and in the end it turns out those "forum crybabies" were right.

We'll see who cries when that currently 18,000$ rifle that was originally sold for IIRC 6,000$ and was purchased by them in Germany for around 2,000-2,500€ and then misrepresented during importation is being collected by the bad and ugly gubinment. Surely the fault is then everywhere (HK for not making them as pistols, the German government for making .223 pistols illegal/restricted in Germany, the ATF not catching their misrepresentation early on, those who reported it, HK USA confirming the facts, the ATF for interfering and the ATF in general for existing) but with AU?
 
#59 ·
As a non-American I do not have any dealings with AU one way or the other.

But selling short barrelled rifles as unrestricted pistols by misrepresenting them as pistols during the import process although they were fully aware that these have been manufactured as rifles seems a bit controversial to me. That bit them at a later date and now current owner are in limbo about the ATFs handling of this issue. As of now, they only approached dealers. But that doesn't mean that this won't change at any point in time.


You mention something about Colt lowers, somebody mentioned "SD Gate", then the MR223 import, now this misrepresentation of a tukish knockoff launcher as a genuine HK product. So I'd say from an observers standpoint that there isn't "only" a few issues here.

And then some users post such remarks:



...and in the end it turns out those "forum crybabies" were right.

We'll see who cries when that currently 18,000$ rifle that was originally sold for IIRC 6,000$ and was purchased by them in Germany for around 2,000-2,500€ and then misrepresented during importation is being collected by the bad and ugly gubinment. Surely the fault is then everywhere (HK for not making them as pistols, the German government for making .223 pistols illegal/restricted in Germany, the ATF not catching their misrepresentation early on, those who reported it, HK USA confirming the facts, the ATF for interfering and the ATF in general for existing) but with AU?
While I agree with most of your points, just to clarify; AU did not import the original MR223's, HKI did that. AU was simply the distributer/retail seller.
 
#110 · (Edited)
So let’s assume those 82 left a while ago were the total number (likely there were a bunch more, also likely a round number), that would have been a original total of 491.590$ of fraudulently HK-marked turkish 5.995$ launchers that were already marked down to a total 410.000$ of still-HK-marked 5.000$ still-turkish launchers, just to be called out on this after denying the fact in writing, only to sell 344.400$ of magically not-anymore-HK-marked-but-still-turkish 4.200$ launchers that somehow still are not called what they are but what they would/could/should have been called would they actually be HK-marked...

...stay tuned for the next chapter of this... ehm... unhinged story of... capitalism? :popcorn:
 
#121 · (Edited)
Glad I found this thread. I'm a huge sucker who falls for the "1 of X produced" far too often, and I had rose tinted glasses on so bad that I still have thorns in my eyes and I missed some of the glaring issues with this. Placed an order around an hour ago and have already requested a refund. I mean it would be cool to own, and the current price ($2900) is a lot better than the original 5-6k at the begining of the thread, but it was a panic buy that I really can't justify just to LARP around with. I also was unaware that there's no A5 version of the 320.

Very deceptive marketing currently, since the manufacturer is still not listed in the title, nor is clone mentioned. The description sounds like it's a genuine HK item with a limited run in 37mm, up until you get to the tiny part tucked away saying it's that KaleKallip, which is easy to miss when you are a buyer in full on FOMO mode.

My personal opinion is the previous listings they had were outright fraudulent, and they've done the bare minimum to create plausible deniability since they are still not being very forthright with what they are selling.


Edit* they cancelled my order. I mentioned the title should include clone or the actual MFG name and not have it hidden at the bottom of the description and they had the audacity to act like it's super obvious this isn't a real HK and that they don't mention HK anywhere in the listing (peep second sentence of the description). Not only that the "bottom" of the description is in the middle of a wall of text... it's the bare minimum transparency to have plausible deniability, but there's very little attempt to be upfront about what this item really is. Also, i brought up the nomenclature being that of HKs and with no clear MFG in the title, its suggestive of being HK, and they said the nomenclature is of CAPCO For the US military. The launchers the US army have are HK and are marked HK as far as I'm aware, from my sample size of one I've gotten to experience, so I dont find that comment convincing at all.

Disappointing experience since I've had decent interactions with them in the past.

Image


Image
 
#124 ·
Edit* they cancelled my order. I mentioned the title should include clone or the actual MFG name and not have it hidden at the bottom of the description and they had the audacity to act like it's super obvious this isn't a real HK and that they don't mention HK anywhere in the listing (peep second sentence of the description). Not only that the "bottom" of the description is in the middle of a wall of text... it's the bare minimum transparency to have plausible deniability, but there's very little attempt to be upfront about what this item really is. Also, i brought up the nomenclature being that of HKs and with no clear MFG in the title, its suggestive of being HK, and they said the nomenclature is of CAPCO For the US military. The launchers the US army have are HK and are marked HK as far as I'm aware, from my sample size of one I've gotten to experience, so I dont find that comment convincing at all.
HK made some of the launchers for the US Military, but the overwhelming majority are manufactured for the US Military under contract by Capco. M320 isn’t a Capco designation, rather a US Military designation for the GLM 40mmm HK launcher.

Regardless the Turkish 37mm signaling device that they refer to as an “A5” variant has nothing to do with the M320, Capco, or HK. It’s a poorly executed clone of questionable quality.

The fact that they originally attempted to pass these off as HK products shows their true intent.
 
#10 ·
Both the HK as well as the CAPCO M320 have a differently shaped right side reciever opening.
Both the HK as well as the CAPCO M320 have no visible trigger pins above the trigger.
Both the HK as well as the CAPCO M320 have a different grip design.

So it's likely not a civilian CAPCO production run as well (I would assume that they don't have the capability nor the need to do any further development for a product they have a as-is production contract for).

Image


Image


And if it would be the alledged "new" and recent "A5" iteration by HK (which would pose the question where the A3 and A4 iterations are?), then the Eagle-over-N proofmark would be a current CIP-N proofmark.
 
#66 ·
So it's likely not a civilian CAPCO production run as well (I would assume that they don't have the capability nor the need to do any further development for a product they have a as-is production contract for).
Hopefully I'm not hijacking the thread here. And, I believe @German doesn't reside in the states, but does anyone know if Capco has produced civilian M320's in the states? Gunbroker turns up nothing other than the GSG9 clone I already mentioned, and someone with a purported authentic HK M320 stock.
 
#15 ·
I am in for one of these, unfortunately I am out of town or I'd head over to their shop monday and see in person what the story is, but AU has proven they bring in legit H&K time after time, and most of the time they're the only guys accomplishing it. They wouldn't sell H&K marked product if it wasn't H&K

H&K MR223, Colt M4 Commando lowers, and Colt M203 37mm, all times the forum crybabies said it was not possible and all times AU delivered, whoever scored them has collector pieces that more than doubled in value in a very short time.

All respect to Tom but he is ultimately a cloner, he doesn't bring any real H&K product to market.

the AU haters always hate, yet half the time they can't afford the stuff and the other half they buy it but cry anyway
 
#51 ·
I am in for one of these, unfortunately I am out of town or I'd head over to their shop monday and see in person what the story is, but AU has proven they bring in legit H&K time after time, and most of the time they're the only guys accomplishing it. They wouldn't sell H&K marked product if it wasn't H&K

H&K MR223, Colt M4 Commando lowers, and Colt M203 37mm, all times the forum crybabies said it was not possible and all times AU delivered, whoever scored them has collector pieces that more than doubled in value in a very short time.

All respect to Tom but he is ultimately a cloner, he doesn't bring any real H&K product to market.

the AU haters always hate, yet half the time they can't afford the stuff and the other half they buy it but cry anyway
It's always interesting to see the AU apologists react to this forum's feedback. This entire discussion has been on-topic, objective and factual. No one is "crying". No one questioned AU's past accomplishments. No one questioned AU's bold moves of bringing things to market that others haven't/couldn't. No one is "hating" on AU. People are asking legitimate questions about a product that even AU responded to by removing from their site. The only "hate" I see is you calling people "crybabies" and poor.
 
#65 · (Edited by Moderator)
[Moderator edit]
I'm definitely interested in one of these, but at this price it would need to be genuine HK. Even if it were authentically licensed HK, I think their description is misleading. I would still be interested even if this information was disclosed, but not at the $5k price. A GSG9 clone went for ~$2300 a few weeks back (https://www.gunbroker.com/Item/1015042297), and I thought that was high. Admittedly though, I don't know much about the collectibility of GSG9 stuff, but it's all cool to me nonetheless.

On a side note, I'm very interested in 37mm and 40mm stuff, so If anyone's looking to offload some things then feel free to hit me up.
 
#78 ·
It's baaaaaaack! Minus HK markings and the nonsense. The info still seems dubious on them.

 
You have insufficient privileges to reply here.