Well I loaded more and went to the range today.
Press: Hornady Lock-N-Load AP with standard powder measure
Chronograph: Beta Master
All shots fired through Ruger P89 (4.5" barrel) and Coharie CA89/MP5 (9" barrel)
--------------------------------------
Reloaded 115 grn. Remington FMJ, 6.5 grn. Power Pistol, Estimated Speed: 1210fps
Ruger P89:
1263
1249
1235
1227
Average: 1243
CA89:
1400
1418
1425
1441
1400
1430
Average: 1419
--------------------------------------
Reloaded 147 grn Berry's HP, 4.7 grn. Power Pistol, 930 est. speed
Ruger P89
960
929
955
922
938
Average: 941
CA89
1019
1070
1051
1073
1080
Average 1059
------------------------------------------------
Factory Remington UMC 115 grn. UMC
Ruger P89
1039
1078
1089
1096
1065
Average: 1073
CA89
1181
1195
1204
1210
1230
Average: 1204
------------------------------------------------
Fiocchi Factory 115 grn. FMJ
Ruger P89
1200
1204
1210
1228
1234
Average: 1215
CA89
1426
1404
1415
1418
1404
Average: 1413
------------------------------------------
S&B Factory 115 grn FMJ
Ruger P89
1112
1119
1120
1126
1151
Average: 1125
CA89
1234
1259
1273
1258
1292
Average: 1263
-----------------------------------------
Fed American Eagle Factory 147 grn. HP
Ruger P89
909
899
918
922
937
Average: 917
CA89
1047
1051
1060
1066
1068
Average: 1058
So it looks like you get a solid 100 fps extra from the longer barrel. The Fiocchi ammo is notably hotter than the S&B, while the S&B is marginally hotter than Remington UMC. The S&B certainly performs better in the MP5 clones though.
I have more research to do. Obviously I'll have to cut my 147 grn. loads down just a bit to make sure they stay subsonic since the longer barrel of the MP5 gets them right on the line.