HKPRO Forums banner

VP9A1

101K views 897 replies 141 participants last post by  veeklog  
#1 ·
I haven’t seen a thread specifically addressing the VP9 A1. Does anyone have additional info?

 
#24 ·
lol!
Yeah I have been paying attention and I think the course for the new gun will be:
1. Excitement over it followed by pics fueling that excitement followed by
2 Pics closer to release that are somewhat different than early pics…followed by
3. A loud but apparently un-influential group of forum members decrying how “HK blew it”….followed by
4. An inability to find the thing because it is selling so well…followed by
5. Theories that that is HK’s master plan, to create demand and not meet it (still sorting that one out lol).

We will see!
 
#21 ·
With the VP9 and VP9SK sharing magazines I see no reason why a VP9K shouldn't share them as well.

Except the pinky is falling off, needs a support extension
Not exactly "falling off", but I'm pretty sure there will be applicable magazine extensions available sooner or later.

If somebody chooses a VP9K over a VP9, he's looking for a short grip to enhance concealability and not for "support extensions". If so, just use a VP9.
 
#33 ·
Looking forward to seeing what's new. Slide serrations look a little different, takedown and slide releases seem to be the same. I wonder if maybe the grip texture will be more aggressive or if the trigger has been upgraded...
 
#38 ·
I totally agree, but wishful thinking on our parts. Strikers are whats in and I don’t think that’s gonna change. It seems like HK isn't ready to make them OR yet. I can’t believe that Sig and Beretta have their legacy hammer guns updated though.
 
#36 ·
Looking forward to learning more about the VP9A1. I am also still waiting on my LGS to get a CC9 in stock for me to play with.

I agree with the above that it would be nice if they could update their hammer fired pistols. All I want is a HK45C with the frame of a P30, rear slide decocker (v3 style), and a thumb safety that can ran like a 1911’s. I would never shoot my 1911s again.
 
#51 ·
That's basically what S&W did with the M&P 2.0 Compact. The barrel is only 0.25" shorter than the most common full size M&P 9/40 models. Those pistols would've had 4.0" barrels like the S&W 5900 series if it weren't for Canada's 105mm minimum barrel length law.

The 2.0 Compact ended up being a much better selling product than the original, VP9SK sized, M&P 1.0 Compact (which got rebranded Subcompact for the 2.0 model), so there's certainly successful precedent for HK to do just what you said.